We are an independent designer, manufacturer and marketer of manipulator and docking hardware, temperature management and tester interface products that are used by semiconductor manufacturers in conjunction with automatic test equipment ("ATE") in the testing of integrated circuits ("ICs" or "semiconductors").

The consolidated entity is comprised of inTEST Corporation (parent) and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We manufacture our products in the U.S., Germany and Singapore. Marketing and support activities are conducted worldwide from our facilities in the U.S., the U.K., Germany, Japan and Singapore. As discussed below, we are in the process of closing our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany, and our engineering and sales office in the U.K. We have three reportable segments which are also our reporting units: Manipulator and Docking Hardware, Temperature Management and Tester Interface.

The semiconductor industry in which we operate is characterized by rapid technological change, competitive pricing pressures and cyclical market patterns. This industry is subject to significant economic downturns at various times. Our financial results are affected by a wide variety of factors, including, but not limited to, general economic conditions worldwide or in the markets in which we operate, economic conditions specific to the semiconductor industry, our ability to safeguard patents and intellectual property in a rapidly evolving market, downward pricing pressures from customers, and our reliance on a relatively few number of customers for a significant portion of our sales. In addition, we are exposed to the risk of obsolescence of our inventory depending on the mix of future business and technological changes within the industry. As a result of these or other factors, we may experience significant period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results.

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of our accounts, including long-lived tangible and intangible assets, goodwill, inventory, deferred income tax valuation allowances and product warranty reserves, are particularly affected by estimates.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and changes in cash flows for the interim periods presented. Certain footnote information has been condensed or omitted from these consolidated financial statements. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (our "2007 Form 10-K").

Reclassification

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to be comparable with the current period's presentation. In particular, prior to the first quarter of 2008, certain facility costs of our Singaporean operation were included under general and administrative expense and selling expense. Effective January 1, 2008, we include these facility costs under cost of revenues to be consistent with the treatment of similar expenses for other manufacturing operations we own. Prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.

Inventories

Inventory is valued at standard cost, which approximates actual cost computed on a first-in, first-out basis, not in excess of market value. Cash flows from the sale of inventory are recorded in operating cash flows. On a quarterly basis, we review our inventories and record excess and obsolete inventory charges based upon our established objective excess and obsolete inventory criteria. These criteria identify material that has not been used in a work order during the prior twelve months and

the quantity of material on hand that is greater than the average annual usage of that material over the prior three years. In certain cases, additional excess and obsolete inventory charges are recorded based upon current industry conditions, anticipated product life cycles, new product introductions and expected future use of the inventory. The charges for excess and obsolete inventory we record establish a new cost basis for the related inventory. We incurred excess and obsolete inventory charges of $816 and $593 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our charges for excess and obsolete inventory during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 include $209 related to inventory at our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany which we have decided to close, as discussed in Note 9 below.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we assess long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could indicate impairment include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of our use of the asset or the strategy for our overall business and significant negative industry or economic trends. When we determine that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we prepare projections of operations for our product segments (or at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities) where these long-lived assets are associated . If the carrying value of the long-lived assets exceeds the undiscounted cash flows of our projections, then we would measure the impairment charge. We measure the impairment based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.

At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our long-lived assets consisted of finite-lived intangible assets of $308 and $273, respectively, and property and equipment of $1,717 and $2,198, respectively. During the third quarter of 2008, we recorded a $133 charge for the partial impairment of certain property and equipment at our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany. We announced our intention to close this facility in September 2008.

Goodwill

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test. We perform our annual assessment for impairment in the fourth quarter of the year. In July 2008 we acquired the assets of Diamond Integration, L.L.C. ("Diamond"), and after completing the allocation of the purchase price of $262, we established goodwill of $130 as of September 30, 2008. This goodwill relates to the Manipulator and Docking Hardware reporting unit. Refer to Note 3 for further information on this acquisition. The following table sets forth changes in the amount of the carrying value of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2008:

Income Taxes

The asset and liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded income tax expense of $146 compared to income tax expense of $197 for the same period in 2007. On a quarterly basis, we record income tax expense or benefit based on the expected annualized effective tax rate for the various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate our businesses. Due to our history of operating losses in both our domestic and certain of our foreign operations, we have recorded a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of these operations, including net operating loss carryforwards, where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not have sufficient taxable income to utilize these assets before they expire. During the first nine months of 2008, the income tax expense recorded primarily represents income tax expense on the taxable income of certain of our foreign operations where we do not have a history of operating losses and therefore do not have net operating loss carryforwards to offset income tax expense on those earnings.

Net Loss Per Common Share

Net loss per common share is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during each period. Common share equivalents represent stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock and are calculated using the treasury stock method. Common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation if their effect is anti-dilutive.

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, a reconciliation of weighted average common shares outstanding - basic to weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted and the average number of potentially dilutive securities and their respective weighted average exercise prices that were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect was anti-dilutive:

Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13. FSP FAS 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to exclude certain leasing transactions accounted for under previously existing accounting guidance.

This exclusion, however, does not apply to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, regardless of whether those assets and liabilities are related to leases. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date for FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until January 1, 2009, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We adopted SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 for assets and liabilities not subject to the deferral. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 as of January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value using an instrument-by-instrument election. SFAS No. 159 requires that unrealized gains and losses be reported in earnings for items measured using the fair value option and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. We adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements as we did not elect to measure any eligible items at fair value that were not already required to be measured at fair value.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 when the market for a financial asset is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including reporting for prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-3 for reporting as of September 30, 2008 did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 4 for further information on fair value measurements.

New Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas, including the treatment of contingent consideration, pre-acquisition contingencies, transaction costs, in-process research and development and restructuring costs. SFAS 141(R) is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008, and early adoption is prohibited. We will adopt SFAS 141(R) beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. SFAS 141(R) will change our accounting for business combinations on a prospective basis.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 also adds certain disclosures to those already prescribed in SFAS No. 142. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008, and early adoption is prohibited. The guidance for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective date.

In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161. FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 amends SFAS No. 133 to require disclosures by entities that assume credit risk through the sale of credit derivatives including credit derivatives embedded in a hybrid instrument. The intent of these enhanced disclosures is to enable users of financial statements to assess the potential effect on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows from these credit derivatives. This FSP also amends FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, to require an additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee. FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods ending after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures. We expect to adopt FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 on December 31, 2008.

On July 15, 2008, we acquired the assets of Diamond Integration, L.L.C. (also referred to herein as "Diamond"), a business that provides post-warranty service for ATE equipment to semiconductor manufacturers. The purchase price consisted of a cash payment of $239, plus transaction costs of $23. The following is an allocation of the purchase price:

As discussed in Note 2, on January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157 for our financial assets and financial liabilities, which consisted of cash and cash equivalents and a note receivable as of September 30, 2008. We will not apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157 until January 1, 2009 for the following major categories of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities: Property and Equipment, Intangible Assets and Goodwill. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument's categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

The following table presents our financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008, consistent with the fair value hierarchy provisions of SFAS No. 157:

Our financial assets and financial liabilities which are measured and recorded at fair value using Level 3 inputs consist of a note receivable. This note receivable is included in Other Assets on our consolidated balance sheet and is more fully discussed in Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in our 2007 Form 10-K. Interest accrued on this note receivable is included in Interest Income on our Statement of Operations. This note receivable is denominated in British Pounds Sterling. Any foreign currency transaction gains or losses recorded related to this note receivable are recorded in Other Income (Expense) on our Statement of Operations. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of this note receivable is presented below:

Texas Instruments Incorporated accounted for 17% and 18% of our consolidated net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. While all three of our operating segments sold products to this customer, these revenues were primarily generated by our Manipulator and Docking Hardware product segment. Teradyne, Inc. accounted for 10% of our consolidated net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. While all three of our operating segments sold products to this customer, these revenues were primarily generated by our Tester Interface and Manipulator and Docking Hardware product segments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, no other customer accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated net revenues.

Inventories held at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were comprised of the following:

In accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 88-1, Issues Relating to Accounting for Leases, we record tenant improvements made to our leased facilities based on the amount of the total cost to construct the improvements, regardless of whether a portion of that cost was paid through an allowance provided by the facility's landlord. The amount of the allowance, if any, is recorded as deferred rent. We amortize deferred rent on a straight-line basis over the lease term and record the amortization as a reduction of rent expense. Amortization of deferred rent was $88 for the nine months ended September 30 during both 2008 and 2007.

In addition, certain of our operating leases contain predetermined fixed escalations of minimum rentals during the original lease terms. For these leases, we recognize the related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease and record the difference between the amounts charged to operations and amounts paid as accrued rent, which is included in other accrued expenses on our balance sheet.

Product Warranties

Warranty expense (recovery) for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $63 and $(122), respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded a reduction in our consolidated warranty accrual reflecting favorable claims experience. The level of our product warranty charges both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues is affected by a number of factors, including the cyclicality of demand in the ATE industry, the prototype nature of much of our business, the complex nature of many of our products, and, at our discretion, providing warranty repairs or replacements to customers after the contracted warranty period has expired in order to promote strong customer relations.

The following table sets forth the changes in the liability for product warranties for the nine months ended September 30, 2008:

In early 2008, we commenced a review of our operations to more aggressively streamline our cost structure in line with the current business environment. As part of this process, we are focusing on methods to increase our profitability worldwide, including pursuing other types of revenue streams and additional growth opportunities. The actions we have taken to-date to reduce our operating cost structure are described below. The review of our operations is on-going. We continue to explore methods to further reduce our costs and we will likely incur additional restructuring charges in future periods, however, we cannot predict the amount of such charges at this time.

Manipulator and Docking Hardware Product Segment Restructuring

On June 30, 2008, we announced that we were reducing the workforce in our Manipulator and Docking Hardware product segment by 18 employees, representing 18% of the total employees in this segment, and implementing a reduced work week for our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany (the "Q2 2008 M&DH Workforce Reduction"). The total costs incurred related to this action were $200. These costs represented one-time termination benefits and were incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. This action was completed in the third quarter of 2008. We expect that the completed Q2 2008 M&DH Workforce Reduction will reduce our annual operating expense structure by approximately $1,378.

On September 12, 2008, we approved a restructuring plan for our Manipulator and Docking Hardware product segment (the "Q3 2008 M&DH Plan"). As a part of this plan, we will permanently close our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany and our engineering and sales office in the U. K. In addition to these facility closures, we reduced our domestic workforce by 4 employees, which represented approximately 7% of the total employees in this segment. We also implemented temporary

salary reductions for certain employees of this product segment, temporarily reduced the fees paid to members of our Board of Directors and implemented permanent reductions for expenses related to our use of third-party vendors. Effective January 1, 2009, we will implement additional temporary and permanent cost reductions associated with our employee benefit plans. This includes the temporary suspension of our 401(k) matching contributions and the implementation of an employee contribution of a portion of the cost of medical coverage for our domestic employees in this product segment. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we incurred $53 in costs related to these actions for one-time termination benefits. We expect to complete these actions and incur additional one-time termination benefits ranging from $100 to $150 and facility closure costs ranging from $200 to $250 during the fourth quarter of 2008. We expect the total costs incurred related to this plan to be in the range of $353 to $453, whic h is made up of one-time termination benefits in the range of $153 to $203 and facility closure costs in the range of $200 to $250. We expect that the completed Q3 2008 M&DH Plan will reduce our annual operating expense structure by approximately $2,176.

Tester Interface Product Segment Restructuring

On September 12, 2008, we approved a restructuring plan for our Tester Interface product segment (the "Q3 2008 TI Plan"). As a part of this plan, we reduced our workforce by 3 employees, which represented approximately 9% of the total employees in this segment. We also implemented temporary salary reductions for certain employees of this product segment, and, effective January 1, 2009, we will implement additional temporary and permanent cost reductions associated with our employee benefit plans, similar to those discussed above for the Q3 2008 M&DH Plan. The total costs incurred related to this action were $8, which represented one-time termination benefits, and were incurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2008. This action was completed in the third quarter of 2008. We expect that the completed Q3 2008 TI Plan will reduce our annual operating expense structure by approximately $546.

Our restructuring costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are summarized as follows:

As of September 30, 2008, we have outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock awards granted under stock-based employee compensation plans that are described more fully in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements in our 2007 Form 10-K.

As of September 30, 2008, total compensation expense to be recognized in future periods was $501. The weighted average period over which this expense is expected to be recognized is 1.8 years. All of this expense is related to nonvested shares of restricted stock.

Restricted Stock Awards

We record compensation expense for restricted stock awards (nonvested shares) based on the quoted market price of our stock at the grant date and amortize the expense over the vesting period. Restricted stock awards generally vest over four years. The following table shows the allocation of the compensation expense we recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, related to nonvested shares:

We have a defined contribution 401(k) plan (the "inTEST 401(k) Plan") for our employees who work in the U.S. As a part of the inTEST 401(k) Plan, we may match a portion of employee contributions. The inTEST 401(k) Plan, including our discretionary employer matching contributions, is more fully discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2007 Form 10-K. In September 2008, as a part of our restructuring actions, we announced that, effective January 1, 2009, we will be suspending our discretionary employer matching contributions to the inTEST 401(k) Plan for employees of our Manipulator and Docking Hardware and Tester Interface product segments.

In addition to the discretionary employer matching contributions for which employees of our Temptronic subsidiary are eligible, upon the termination of the Temptronic Equity Participation Plan ("EPP"), we acknowledged that it was our intention to contribute $3,000 in the aggregate to the inTEST 401(k) Plan as a form of profit sharing (not to exceed $300 per year) for the benefit of Temptronic employees. The amount of these profit sharing contributions approximates the amount that we had been committed to contribute to the EPP as of its termination date. All such profit sharing contributions are at the discretion of management, and will be allocated to employees annually in essentially the same manner in which the shares held by the EPP had been allocated. The vesting provisions for these contributions will be the same as those of the inTEST 401(k) Plan.

Accruals for profit sharing contributions totaling $225 were made during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Through September 30, 2008, we had made a total of $1,253 in profit sharing contributions. We have historically funded these obligations through the use of treasury shares during the quarter subsequent to the quarter in which we record the profit sharing liability, although management has the discretion to use cash to fund these obligations. Our current intention is to use cash to fund these obligations when our stock price is below $3.00 per share.

We have three reportable segments, which are also our reporting units: Manipulator and Docking Hardware Products, Temperature Management Products and Tester Interface Products. The Manipulator and Docking Hardware product segment includes the operations of our Cherry Hill, New Jersey manufacturing facility as well as the operations of three of our foreign subsidiaries: inTEST KK (Japan), inTEST PTE, Limited (Singapore) and Intestlogic GmbH (Germany). Diamond, which we acquired in July 2008 as more fully discussed in Note 3, is included in the operations of our Cherry Hill, NJ manufacturing facility. Sales of this segment consist primarily of manipulator and docking hardware products which we design, manufacture and market, as well as certain other related products which we design and market, but which are manufactured by third parties. In addition, this segment provides post warranty service and support for various ATE equipment. The Temperature Management product segment includes the operations of Te mptronic Corporation in Sharon, Massachusetts as well as Temptronic GmbH (Germany). Sales of this segment consist primarily of temperature management systems which we design, manufacture and market under our Temptronic product line. In addition, this segment provides after-sale service and support, which is paid for by its customers. The Tester Interface product segment includes the operations of inTEST Silicon Valley Corporation. Sales of this segment consist primarily of tester interface products which we design, manufacture and market. We operate our business worldwide, and all three segments sell their products both domestically and internationally. All three segments sell to semiconductor manufacturers, third-party test and assembly houses and ATE manufacturers. Our Temperature Management product segment also sells into a variety of industries outside of the semiconductor industry, including the aerospace, automotive, communications, consumer electronics, defense and medical industries. Intercompany pri cing between segments is either a multiple of cost for component parts or list price for finished goods.

On October 6, 2008, we acquired Sigma Systems Corp. (also referred to herein as "Sigma"), a manufacturer of thermal platforms, custom configured environmental chambers and other environmental test solutions for a variety of industries including automotive, medical/pharmaceutical, electronic, aerospace/defense and ATE. Sigma will be included in our Temperature Management product segment and will expand our product offerings outside the ATE market. We believe Sigma's products are highly complementary to our other Temperature Management products and will greatly facilitate our further penetration into non-ATE markets. The purchase price was approximately $3.5 million and was paid with $1.0 million in cash, 550,000 shares of our common stock, and an agreement by us to issue non-negotiable promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount equal to $1.5 million, subject to adjustment based upon the amount of certain current assets and liabilities of Sigma at closing. The notes will bear interest at the prim e rate plus 1.25% and will be secured by the assets of Sigma. Interest will be payable annually. Principal will be payable in four equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of closing. We expect to complete the purchase price allocation for this transaction and the determination of the note amounts during the fourth quarter of 2008. 

Overview

As discussed more fully in our 2007 Form 10-K, our business and results of operations are substantially dependent upon the demand for ATE by semiconductor manufacturers and companies that specialize in the testing of ICs. Demand for ATE is driven by semiconductor manufacturers that are opening new, or expanding existing, semiconductor fabrication facilities or upgrading existing equipment, which in turn is dependent upon the current and anticipated market demand for semiconductors and products incorporating semiconductors. In the past, the semiconductor industry has been highly cyclical with recurring periods of oversupply, which often have a severe impact on the semiconductor industry's demand for ATE, including the products we manufacture. This can cause wide fluctuations in both our orders and net revenues and, depending on our ability to react quickly to these shifts in demand, can significantly impact our results of operations. These industry cycles are difficult to predict and in recent years have beco me more volatile and shorter in duration. Because the industry cycles are generally characterized by sequential periods of growth or declines in orders and net revenues during each cycle, year over year comparisons of operating results may not always be as meaningful as comparisons of periods at similar points in either up or down cycles. In addition, during both downward and upward cycles in our industry, in any given quarter, the trend in both our orders and net revenues can be erratic. This can occur, for example, when orders are canceled or currently scheduled delivery dates are accelerated or postponed by a significant customer or when customer forecasts and general business conditions fluctuate during a quarter, as during the third quarter of 2008, and continuing into the fourth quarter, when we saw some push outs and cancellations on orders.

We believe that purchases of most of our products are typically made from semiconductor manufacturers' capital expenditure budgets. Certain portions of our business, however, are generally less dependent upon the capital expenditure budgets of the end users. For example, purchases of certain related ATE interface products, such as sockets and interface boards, which must be replaced periodically, are typically made from the end users' operating budgets. In addition, purchases of certain of our products, such as docking hardware, for the purpose of upgrading or improving the utilization, performance and efficiency of existing ATE, tend to be counter cyclical to sales of new ATE. Moreover, we believe a portion of our sales of temperature management products results from the increasing need for temperature testing of circuit boards and specialized components that do not have the design or quantity to be tested in an electronic device handler. In addition, in recent years we have begun to market our Thermostream temperature management systems in industries outside semiconductor test, such as the automotive, medical/pharmaceutical, electronic, aerospace/defense and telecommunications industries. We believe our October 6, 2008 acquisition of Sigma Systems Corp. (as discussed in Note 13 of the footnotes to our consolidated financial statements) will further expand our temperature management product offerings and will contribute to increasing our revenues in industries outside semiconductor test. We believe that these industries usually are less cyclical than the ATE industry.

While the majority of our orders and net revenues are derived from the ATE market, our operating results do not always follow the overall trend in the ATE market in any given period. We believe that these anomalies may be driven by a variety of changes within the ATE market, including, for example, changing product requirements, longer time periods between new product offerings by ATE Manufacturers (OEMs) and changes in customer buying patterns. In particular, demand for our manipulator, docking hardware and tester interface products, which are sold exclusively within the ATE industry, and our operating margins in these product segments have been affected by shifts in the competitive landscape, including (i) customers placing heightened emphasis on shorter lead times (which places increased demands on our available engineering and production capacity increasing unit costs) and ordering in smaller quantities (which prevents us from acquiring component materials in larger volumes at lower cost and increasing u nit costs), (ii) the increasing practice of OEMs to specify other suppliers as primary vendors, with less frequent opportunities to compete for such designations, (iii) the increased role of third-party test and assembly houses in the ATE market and their requirement of products with a greater range of use at the lowest cost, and (iv) customer supply line management groups demanding lower prices and spreading purchases across multiple vendors. These shifts in market practices have had, and may continue to have, varying levels of impact on our operating results, but it is difficult to quantify the impact of these practices from period to period. Management has taken, and will continue to take, such actions it deems appropriate to adjust our strategies, products and operations to counter such shifts in market practices as they become evident, but there can be no assurance that such actions will be fully effective or timely made.

Net Revenues and Orders

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a breakdown of the net revenues from unaffiliated customers both by product segment and geographic area (based on the location of the selling entity).

Backlog

At September 30, 2008, our backlog of unfilled orders for all products was approximately $3.0 million compared with approximately $3.9 million at June 30, 2008 and $5.1 million at September 30, 2007. Our backlog includes customer orders which we have accepted, substantially all of which we expect to deliver in 2008. While backlog is calculated on the basis of firm purchase orders, a customer may cancel an order or accelerate or postpone currently scheduled delivery dates. Our backlog may be affected by the tendency of customers to rely on short lead times available from suppliers, including us, in periods of depressed demand. In periods of increased demand, there is a tendency towards longer lead times that has the effect of increasing backlog. As a result, our backlog at a particular date is not necessarily indicative of sales for any future period.

Business Restructuring Initiatives

In early 2008, we commenced a review of our operations to more aggressively streamline our cost structure in line with the current business environment. As part of this process, we are focusing on methods to increase our profitability worldwide, including pursuing other types of revenue streams and additional growth opportunities. The actions we have taken to reduce our operating cost structure are described below. The review of our operations is on-going. We continue to explore methods to further reduce our costs and we will likely incur additional restructuring charges in future periods, however, we cannot predict the amount of such charges at this time.

Manipulator and Docking Hardware Product Segment Restructuring. On June 30, 2008, we announced that we were reducing the workforce in our Manipulator and Docking Hardware product segment by 18 employees, representing 18% of the total employees in this segment, and implementing a reduced work week for our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany (the "Q2 2008 M&DH Workforce Reduction"). The total costs incurred related to this action were $200,000. These costs represented one-time termination benefits and were incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. This action was completed in the third quarter of 2008. We expect that the completed Q2 2008 M&DH Workforce Reduction will reduce our annual operating expense structure by approximately $1.4 million

On September 12, 2008, we approved a restructuring plan for our Manipulator and Docking Hardware product segment (the "Q3 2008 M&DH Plan"). As a part of this plan, we will permanently close our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany and our engineering and sales office in the U. K. In addition to these facility closures, we reduced our domestic workforce by 4 employees, which represented approximately 7% of the total employees in this segment. We also implemented temporary salary reductions for certain employees of this product segment, temporarily reduced the fees paid to members of our Board of Directors, and implemented permanent reductions for expenses related to our use of third-party vendors. Effective January 1, 2009, we will implement additional temporary and permanent cost reductions associated with our employee benefit plans. This includes the temporary suspension of our 401(k) matching contributions and the implementation of an employee contribution of a portion of the cost of medical cove rage for our domestic employees in this product segment. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we incurred $53,000 in costs related to these actions for one-time termination benefits. We expect to complete these actions and incur additional one-time termination benefits ranging from $100,000 to $150,000 and facility closure costs ranging from $200,000 to $250,000 during the fourth quarter of 2008. We expect the total costs incurred related to this plan to be in the range of $353,000 to $453,000, which is made up of one-time termination benefits in the range of $153,000 to $203,000 and facility closure costs in the range of $200,000 to $250,000. We expect that the completed Q3 2008 M&DH Plan will reduce our annual operating expense structure by approximately $2.2 million.

Tester Interface Product Segment Restructuring. On September 12, 2008, we approved a restructuring plan for our Tester Interface product segment (the "Q3 2008 TI Plan"). As a part of this plan, we reduced our workforce by 3 employees, which represented approximately 9% of the total employees in this segment. We also implemented temporary salary reductions for certain employees of this product segment, and, effective January 1, 2009, we will implement additional temporary and permanent cost reductions associated with our employee benefit plans, similar to those discussed above for the Q3 2008 M&DH Plan. The total costs incurred related to this action were $8,000, which represented one-time termination benefits, and were incurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2008. This action was completed in the third quarter of 2008. We expect that the completed Q3 2008 TI Plan will reduce our annual operating expense structure by approximately $546,000.

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

We assess the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could indicate impairment include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of our use of the asset or

the strategy for our overall business and significant negative industry or economic trends. When we determine that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we prepare projections of operations for our product segments (or at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities) where these long-lived assets are associated. If the carrying value of the long-lived assets exceeds the undiscounted cash flows of our projections, then we would measure the impairment charge. We measure the impairment based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. At September 30, 2008, our long-lived assets consisted of $308,000 of finite-lived intangible assets and $1.7 million of property and equipment. During the third quarter of 2008, we recorded a $133,000 charge for the partial impairment of certain property and equipment at our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany. We announced our intention to close this facility in September 2008.

Acquisitions

As discussed in more detail in our 2007 Form 10-K, we continue to pursue the acquisition of complementary businesses or technologies as a part of our strategy to grow our business and diversify our revenue streams outside the ATE market. In July 2008, we acquired the assets of Diamond Integration, L.L.C., a business that provides post-warranty service for ATE equipment to semiconductor manufacturers. The total cost to acquire these assets was $262,000. Please see Note 3 of the footnotes to our consolidated financial statements for detail of the purchase price allocation.

On October 6, 2008, we acquired Sigma Systems Corp. ("Sigma"), a manufacturer of thermal platforms, custom configured environmental chambers and other environmental test solutions for a variety of industries including automotive, medical/pharmaceutical, electronic, aerospace/defense and ATE. Sigma will be included in our Temperature Management product segment and will expand our product offerings outside the ATE market. We believe Sigma's products are highly complementary to our other Temperature Management products and will greatly facilitate our further penetration into non-ATE markets. The purchase price was approximately $3.5 million and was paid with $1.0 million in cash, 550,000 shares of our common stock, and an agreement by us to issue non-negotiable promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount equal to $1.5 million, subject to adjustment based upon the amount of certain current assets and liabilities of Sigma at closing. The notes will bear interest at the prime rate plus 1.25% and will be secu red by the assets of Sigma. Interest will be payable annually. Principal will be payable in four equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of closing. We expect to complete the purchase price allocation for this transaction and the determination of the note amounts during the fourth quarter of 2008.

Product/Customer Mix

Our three product segments each have multiple products that we design, manufacture and sell to our customers. The gross margin on each product we offer is impacted by a number of factors, including the amount of intellectual property (such as patents) utilized in the product, the number of units ordered by the customer at one time, or the amount of inTEST designed and fabricated material included in our product compared with the amount of third-party designed and fabricated material included in our product. The weight of each of these factors, as well as the current market conditions, determines the ultimate sales price we can obtain for our products and the resulting gross margin.

The mix of products we sell in any period is ultimately determined by our customers' needs. Therefore, the mix of products sold in any given period can change significantly from the prior period. As a result, our consolidated gross margin can be significantly impacted in any given period by a change in the mix of products sold in that period.

We sell most of our products to semiconductor manufacturers and third-party test and assembly houses (end user sales) and to ATE manufacturers (OEM sales) who ultimately resell our equipment with theirs to semiconductor manufacturers. Our Temperature Management product segment also sells into a variety of other industries including the aerospace, automotive, communications, consumer electronics, defense, and medical industries. The mix of customers during any given period will affect our gross margin due to differing sales discounts and commissions. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, our OEM sales as a percentage of net revenues were 19% and 22%, respectively.

OEM sales generally have a lower gross margin than end user sales, as OEM sales historically have had a more significant discount. Our current net operating margins on most OEM sales, however, are only slightly less than margins on end user sales because of the payment of third-party sales commissions on most end user sales. We have also continued to experience demands from our OEM customers' supply line managers to reduce our sales prices to them. If we cannot further reduce our manufacturing and operating costs, these pricing pressures will continue to reduce our gross and operating margins.

Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains statements relating to possible future events and results that are considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "intends," "may," "will," "should" "or anticipates" or similar terminology. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on various assumptions. Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, investors and prospective investors are cautioned that such statements are only projections, and there cannot be any assurance that these events or results will occur.

Information about the primary risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from our historic results or the results described in the forward-looking statements made in this report or presented elsewhere by Management from time to time are included in Part I, Item 1A - "Risk Factors" of our 2007 Form 10-K, as updated in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Results of Operations

All of our products are used by semiconductor manufacturers in conjunction with ATE in the testing of ICs. Consequently, the results of operations for each product segment are generally affected by the same factors. Separate discussions and analyses for each product segment would be repetitive and obscure any unique factors that affected the results of operations of our different product segments. The discussion and analysis that follows, therefore, is presented on a consolidated basis and includes discussion of factors unique to each product segment where significant to an understanding of that segment.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the principal items included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of total net revenues.

During the third quarter of 2008, our net revenues from customers in the U.S. decreased 30%. After adjustment to eliminate the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, our net revenues from customers in Europe decreased 68% while our net revenues from customers in Asia increased 16%, during the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. The larger percentage decrease in our net revenues from customers in Europe primarily reflects lower demand experienced by our Intestlogic operation in Germany. The increase in our net revenues from customers in Asia primarily reflects increased sales of third-party products distributed by our operation in Japan. In the second half of 2007, our sales of third-party products by this operation had significantly declined as they had lost one of the product lines they had been distributing when that company was sold. Since that time, this operation has found new distribution opportunities and has begun to see an increase in net revenues as a res ult.

Gross Margin. Gross margin was 32% for the third quarter of 2008 compared to 39% for the same period in 2007. The decrease in gross margin is primarily the result of an increase in our fixed operating costs as a percentage of net revenues reflecting that these costs were not as fully absorbed due to the $4.0 million decrease in our net revenues during the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. Although, in absolute dollar terms, our fixed operating costs decreased $378,000 during the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, as a percentage of net revenues these costs increased to 22% for the third quarter of 2008 as compared to 18% for the comparable period in 2007. The decline in the absolute dollar value of our fixed operating costs was primarily a result of lower salary and benefits expense, reflecting headcount reductions that occurred after the third quarter of 2007. These headcount reductions were primarily driven by the lower levels of demand we have been experiencing for our products. In addition to the decline in salary and benefits expense, we also incurred lower levels of rent, reflecting a reduction in the amount of space we are occupying, and lower depreciation expense, reflecting a lower asset base during the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. In addition to the increase in our fixed operating costs as a percentage of net revenues, our excess and obsolete inventory charges increased both in absolute dollar terms and as a percentage of net revenues for the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. The $226,000 increase in our charges for excess and obsolete inventory during the third quarter of 2008 is primarily related to inventory at our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany, which we have decided to close.

Selling Expense. Selling expense was $1.9 million for the third quarter of 2008 compared to $2.1 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $254,000, or 12%. The decrease primarily reflects lower levels of sales commissions as a result of the $4.0 million decrease in net revenues experienced in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the third quarter of 2007.

Engineering and Product Development Expense. Engineering and product development expense was $1.2 million for the third quarter of 2008 compared to $1.4 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $129,000, or 10%. The decrease is primarily a result of lower salary and benefits expense, reflecting lower headcount, and a reduction in the use of third-party consultants. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in spending on research and development materials, primarily at our facility in Amerang, Germany where development of a new family of manipulators has been ongoing. These development efforts are nearing completion and will be transferred to our facility in Cherry Hill, New Jersey to the extent necessary when the facility in Germany is closed later this year.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense was $1.8 million for the third quarter of 2008 compared to $2.0 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $203,000, or 10%. The decrease primarily represents reductions in salary and benefits expense, reflecting lower headcount, combined with a reduction in international travel reflecting both reduced business activity and our efforts to control costs in this area.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008 we recorded a charge of $133,000 related to the impairment of certain long-lived assets of our facility in Amerang, Germany which we are in the process of closing, as previously discussed. There were no similar charges during the third quarter of 2007.

Restructuring and Other Charges. Restructuring and other charges were $61,000 for the third quarter of 2008. There were no similar charges during the same period in 2007. As previously discussed, in September 2008, we reduced the domestic workforce in our Manipulator and Docking Hardware and Tester Interface product segments by a total of 7 employees. In addition, we announced our decision to close our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany and, as a result, we will further reduce our workforce in our Manipulator and Docking Hardware product segment in the fourth quarter of 2008. The costs incurred during the third quarter of 2008 represent one-time termination benefits related to these actions.

Other Income. Other income was $85,000 for the third quarter of 2008 compared to $148,000 for the comparable period in 2007, a decrease of $63,000. The decrease primarily represents lower interest income, reflecting a reduction in our average cash balance and the rate of interest being earned.

Income Tax Expense. For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we recorded income tax expense of $37,000 compared to income tax expense of $78,000 for the same period in 2007. On a quarterly basis, we record income tax expense or benefit based on the expected annualized effective tax rate for the various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate our businesses. Due to our history of operating losses in both our domestic and certain of our foreign operations, we have recorded a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of these operations, including net operating loss carryforwards, where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not have sufficient taxable income to utilize these assets before they expire. During the third quarter of 2008, the income tax expense recorded primarily represents income tax expense on the taxable income of one of our foreign operations where we do not have a history of operating losses and therefore do not have net operating loss carryforwards to o ffset income tax expense on those earnings. 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007

Net Revenues. Net revenues were $32.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $37.3 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $5.3 million, or 14%. For the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, our net revenues (net of intersegment sales) in our Manipulator and Docking Hardware and Temperature Management product segments declined 25% and 16%, respectively, while the net revenues (net of intersegment sales) of our Tester Interface product segment increased 30%. The decrease in the net revenues of our Manipulator and Docking Hardware and Temperature Management product segments reflects lower levels of demand experienced in the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 by these groups which we believe is the result of the factors previously discussed in the Overview. Our Tester Interface product segment has also experienced reduced levels of demand in previous periods as a result of these same factors. We believe the inc rease in the net revenues of our Tester Interface product segment in the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 reflects both the significant extent to which the reduced demand had impacted this segment during the first nine months of 2007 as well as increased demand during the first nine months of 2008, particularly during the second quarter of 2008, for certain products recently developed by this segment, as previously discussed in the Overview.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, our net revenues from customers in the U.S. decreased 15%. After adjustment to eliminate the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, our net revenues from customers in Europe and Asia decreased 35% and 4%, respectively, during the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. The larger percentage decrease in our net revenues from customers in Europe primarily reflects lower demand experienced by our Intestlogic operation in Germany. The lower percentage decrease in our net revenues from customers in Asia primarily reflects increased sales of third-party products distributed by our operation in Japan, as previously discussed.

Gross Margin. Gross margin was 37% for the first nine months of 2008 as compared to 38% for the same period in 2007. The decrease in gross margin primarily reflects an increase in excess and obsolete inventory charges related to inventory at our facility in Amerang, Germany, as previously discussed. Although the absolute dollar value of our fixed operating costs declined $1.1 million, these costs were not as fully absorbed as a result of the $5.3 million decline in net revenues. Consequently, these costs remained relatively unchanged as a percentage of net revenues at 20% in each of the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. The decline in the absolute dollar value of our fixed operating costs was primarily the result of the aforementioned lower salary and benefits expense, reductions in rent and lower depreciation expense, as discussed in the quarter-to-quarter comparison.

Selling Expense. Selling expense was $6.2 million for the first nine months of 2008 as compared to $6.6 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $387,000, or 6%. This decrease was primarily the result of lower levels of sales commissions, reflecting the $5.3 million decrease in net revenues, and a reduction in travel costs, also reflecting the significantly reduced level of business activity. These decreases were partially offset by increased warranty charges. The increase in warranty charges primarily reflects that, during the first nine months of 2007, we recorded a recovery of previously expensed warranty charges as a result of favorable claims experience. There was no similar recovery recorded during the first nine months of 2008.

Engineering and Product Development Expense. Engineering and product development expense was $4.1 million for the first nine months of 2008 as compared to $4.2 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $100,000, or 2%. Lower salary and benefits expense was offset by an increase in spending on materials used in new product development, as previously discussed in the quarter-to-quarter comparison. In addition, there was also an increase in professional fees related to our intellectual property during the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense was $6.0 million for the first nine months of 2008 compared to $6.1 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $90,000, or 2%. Lower salary and benefits expense and a reduction in the level of travel was partially offset by an increase in fees related to third-party professionals who assist us with the documentation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting procedures and related compliance matters.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 we recorded a charge of $133,000 related to the impairment of certain long-lived assets of our facility in Amerang, Germany which we are in the process of closing, as previously discussed. There were no similar charges during the comparable period in 2007.

Restructuring and Other Charges. Restructuring and other charges were $261,000 for the first nine months of 2008. There were no similar charges during the same period in 2007. As previously discussed, in June and September 2008, we reduced our workforce in certain of our product segments. In addition, in September 2008, we announced our decision to close our manufacturing facility in Amerang, Germany and, as a result, we will further reduce our workforce in our Manipulator and Docking Hardware product segment in the fourth quarter of 2008. The costs incurred were for one-time termination benefits related to these actions.

Other Income. Other income was $167,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $395,000 for the comparable period in 2007, a decrease of $228,000. The decrease primarily represents lower interest income, as previously discussed, combined with an increase in foreign currency transaction losses.

Income Tax Expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded income tax expense of $146,000 compared to income tax expense of $197,000 for the same period in 2007. On a quarterly basis, we record income tax expense or benefit based on the expected annualized effective tax rate for the various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate our businesses. Due to our history of operating losses in both our domestic and certain of our foreign operations, we have recorded a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of these operations, including net operating loss carryforwards, where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not have sufficient taxable income to utilize these assets before they expire. During the first nine months of 2008, the income tax expense recorded primarily represents income tax expense on the taxable income of one of our foreign operations where we do not have a history of operating losses and therefore do not have net operating loss carryforwards to offset income tax expense on those earnings.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash used in operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $1.6 million compared to $2.2 million for the same period in 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, inventory decreased $611,000 and accounts receivable decreased $423,000 primarily reflecting the reduction in business activity during 2008.

Accounts payable increased $333,000 for the first nine months of 2008, primarily reflecting the timing of payments to vendors. Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased $318,000 during the first nine months of 2008, primarily as a result of our Japanese operation receiving a refund of an estimated tax payment made in 2007 combined with changes in the amount of prepaid consumption and value added taxes at certain of our foreign subsidiaries.

Purchases of property and equipment were $320,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. These purchases primarily consisted of demonstration equipment for our facilities in Sharon, Massachusetts and San Jose, California. We have no significant commitments for capital expenditures for the balance of 2008; however, depending upon changes in market demand, we may make such purchases as we deem necessary and appropriate. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 we used $262,000 to complete the acquisition of Diamond Integration, L.L.C. Please see Note 3 of the footnotes to our consolidated financial statements for further information on the allocation of the purchase price.

Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $5,000, which represents payments made under capital lease obligations.

We have a secured credit facility that provides for maximum borrowings of $250,000. We have not utilized this facility to borrow any funds. Our usage consists of the issuance of letters of credit in the face amount of $250,000. We pay a quarterly fee of 1.5% per annum on the total amount of the outstanding letters of credit. The terms of the loan agreement require that we maintain a minimum level of $200,000 of domestic cash. This credit facility expires on September 30, 2009, and we expect it to be renewed for another year.

inTEST CORPORATION

As of September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $9.9 million. In both 2007 and the first ten months of 2008, however, we experienced operating losses and cash outflows, and, during early October, we utilized approximately $1.4 million of our cash in connection with the acquisition of Sigma, as previously discussed. Our cash and cash equivalents as of October 31, 2008 were approximately $8.2 million. In addition, as part of the Sigma transaction, we agreed to issue non-negotiable promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount equal to $1.5 million, subject to adjustment based upon certain current assets and liabilities of Sigma at closing. These notes will bear interest at the prime rate plus 1.25% and will be secured by the assets of Sigma. Interest will be payable annually. Principal will be payable in four equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of closing. We believe our cash balances will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

In early 2008, as previously discussed, we commenced a review of our operations to more aggressively streamline our cost structure in line with the current business environment and during the second and third quarters of 2008 took actions that are expected to reduce our annual operating expense structure by approximately $4.1 million. The cost savings from our restructuring actions completed during the second quarter of 2008, which are expected to total $1.4 million annually, will fully take effect in the fourth quarter of 2008, while the savings from the restructuring actions taken during the third quarter of 2008, which are expected to total $2.7 million annually, will fully take effect in the first quarter of 2009. During the second and third quarters of 2008, we incurred $394,000 in charges for one-time termination benefits and long-lived asset impairments related to these actions. We expect to incur additional one-time termination benefits and facility closure costs ranging from $300,000 to $400,000 dur ing the fourth quarter of 2008. The review of our operations is on-going. We continue to explore methods to further reduce our costs, and we will likely incur additional restructuring charges in future periods, however, we cannot predict the amount of such charges at this time or the potential cost savings that may result from such actions. In addition, we continue to pursue opportunities to make strategic acquisitions of businesses and technology. Such acquisitions may require significant amounts of cash, debt or equity financing, or a combination of the foregoing. Should the current downturn be prolonged and we are unable to reduce our operating expenses sufficiently, or should we utilize significant amounts of cash to implement our acquisition strategy and service our acquisition-related indebtedness, we may require additional debt or equity financing to meet working capital or capital expenditure needs. We cannot be certain that, if needed, we would be able to raise such additional financing or upon what terms such financing would be available.

New or Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

See the Notes to the consolidated financial statements for information concerning the implementation and impact of new or recently adopted accounting standards.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventories, long-lived tangible and intangible assets, goodwill, deferred income tax valuation allowances and product warranty reserves. We base our estimates on historical experience and on appropriate and customary assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Some of these accounting estimates and assumptions are particularly sensitive because of their significance to our consolidated financial statements and because of th e possibility that future events affecting them may differ markedly from what had been assumed when the financial statements were prepared. As of September 30, 2008, there have been no significant changes to the accounting policies that we have deemed critical. These policies are more fully described in our 2007 Form 10-K.

This disclosure is not required for a smaller reporting company.

inTEST CORPORATION

CEO and CFO Certifications. Included with this Quarterly Report as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are two certifications, one by each of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (the "Section 302 Certifications"). This Item 4T contains information concerning the evaluations of our disclosure controls and procedures that are referred to in the Section 302 Certifications. This information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics addressed therein.

Evaluation of Our Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The SEC requires that as of the end of the quarter covered by this Report, our CEO and CFO must evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures and report on the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.

"Disclosure controls and procedures" mean the controls and other procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), such as this Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms promulgated by the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, as opposed to absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within an entity have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individua l acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a system of controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Accordingly, our management has designed the disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system were met.

CEO/CFO Conclusions about the Effectiveness of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b), inTEST management, including our CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Report, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

From time to time we may be a party to legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings.

inTEST CORPORATION

In addition to the other information contained in this report, you should consider the information regarding the primary risks and uncertainties that could materially and adversely affect our future performance or could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements, that appears in Part I, Item 1A -- "Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as supplemented or updated below.

If we are not able to reduce our operating expenses during periods of weak demand, or if we utilize significant amounts of cash to implement our acquisition strategy, we will erode our cash resources and may not have sufficient cash to operate our businesses.

In recent years, we implemented a variety of cost controls and restructured our operations with the goal of significantly reducing our fixed operating costs to position ourselves to more effectively meet the needs of the fluid ATE market. In both 2007 and the first ten months of 2008, however, we experienced operating losses and cash outflows (including the use of $1.4 million for the acquisition of Sigma), and our cash and cash equivalents as of October 31, 2008 were approximately $8.2 million. In early 2008, we commenced a review of our operations to more aggressively streamline our cost structure in line with the current business environment and during the second and third quarters of 2008 took actions that are expected to reduce our annual operating expense structure by approximately $4.1 million. During the second and third quarters of 2008, we incurred $394,000 in charges for one-time termination benefits and long-lived asset impairments related to these actions. We expect to incur additional o ne-time termination benefits and facility closure costs ranging from $300,000 to $400,000 during the fourth quarter of 2008. The review of our operations is ongoing. We continue to explore methods to further reduce our costs, and we will likely incur additional restructuring charges in future periods, however, we cannot predict the amount of such charges at this time or the potential cost savings that may result from such actions. At the same time, the acquisition of new businesses and technologies also remain key strategies for improving our performance independent of a market recovery. Our ability to consummate such acquisitions may be hindered by the fact that they may require significant amounts of cash, debt or equity financing, or a combination of the foregoing. Should the current downturn be prolonged and we are unable to reduce our operating expenses sufficiently, or should we utilize significant amounts of cash to implement our acquisition strategy, we may require additional debt or equity financing to meet working capital or capital expenditure needs. While we believe our cash balances will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months, we cannot determine with certainty that, if needed, we would be able to raise additional funding through either equity or debt financing under these circumstances or on what terms such financing would be available.

If we fail to maintain compliance with the requirements for continued listing on NASDAQ, our common shares could be delisted from trading on NASDAQ, which could materially adversely affect the liquidity of our common shares, the price of our common shares, and our ability to raise additional capital.

If we fail to maintain compliance with the requirements for continued listing on The NASDAQ Global Market ("Global Market"), our common shares could be delisted from trading on the Global Market. One of the requirements for continued listing is that the closing bid price for our common stock be above $1.00 per share (the "Minimum Bid Price Rule"). On September 30, 2008, the closing bid price for our common stock decreased below $1.00 per share. If this condition were to exist for 30 consecutive business days, we could receive a NASDAQ Staff Determination letter notifying us that we were not in compliance with the requirement of the Minimum Bid Price Rule. If we received such a notification, we would have 180 days to regain compliance by having the bid price of our common shares close at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days prior to the end of the 180-day period.

On October 16, 2008, NASDAQ suspended the enforcement of the Minimum Bid Price Rule. The rule will be reinstated on Monday, January 19, 2009. If the closing bid price for our common stock is not at that time in excess of $1.00 per share, the thirty business day compliance period, followed by the 180 day cure period, would begin to run at that time, again, unless NASDAQ takes further action to suspend enforcement of the Minimum Bid Price Rule.

If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of the Global Market, our common shares could be delisted from the Global Market in which case our common shares would be traded on The NASDAQ Capital Market ("Capital Market"), if we satisfy it's minimum initial listing requirements, or The OTC Bulletin Board ("OTC"), if we do not satisfy the minimum initial listing requirements of the Capital Market. As of October 31, 2008, we do not currently meet the minimum initial listing requirements of the Capital Market . There can be no assurance that our common shares would be eligible for trading on any such alternative exchange or market. If we are delisted from NASDAQ, it could materially reduce the liquidity of our common shares, impact the price of our common shares, and impair our ability to raise capital.

As discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, on October 6, 2008, we acquired Sigma Systems Corp., a privately-held California corporation. The consideration paid by the Company to the Sigma stockholders included $1.0 million in cash, 550,000 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Shares"), and an agreement by the Company to issue non-negotiable promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount equal to $1.5 million, subject to adjustment based upon the amount of certain of Sigma's current assets and liabilities at closing as detailed in the Merger Agreement. The offer and sale of the Shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction not involving a public offering.

None

None

None

A list of the Exhibits which are required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and filed with this Report is set forth in the Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page, which Index to Exhibits is incorporated herein by reference. 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

        (b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

        (b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.