UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________
FORM 10-Q
_____________
(Mark One)
☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018 or
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________________ to ___________________
Commission File Number 1-36117
inTEST Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware |
22-2370659 |
804 East Gate Drive, Suite 200
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(856) 505-8800
(Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code)
_________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (SS 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐ |
Accelerated filer ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company ☒ |
Emerging growth company ☐ |
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES ☐ NO ☒
Number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of the close of business on April 30, 2018:
10,473,558
|
Page |
|
PART I. |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2018 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2017 |
1 |
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 |
2 |
|
3 | |
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2018 |
4 |
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 |
5 |
|
6 | |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
19 |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
24 | |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
24 | |
|
|
|
PART II. |
||
|
|
|
Item 1. |
25 | |
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
25 | |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
25 | |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
25 | |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
25 | |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
25 | |
|
|
|
Item 6. |
25 | |
|
||
26 |
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
March 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
|
(Unaudited) |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 14,438 | $ | 13,290 | ||||
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $152 and $213, respectively |
11,524 | 12,166 | ||||||
Inventories |
6,668 | 4,966 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
657 | 577 | ||||||
Total current assets |
33,287 | 30,999 | ||||||
Property and equipment: |
||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
4,993 | 5,033 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
1,861 | 822 | ||||||
Gross property and equipment |
6,854 | 5,855 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(4,451 | ) |
(4,314 | ) |
||||
Net property and equipment |
2,403 | 1,541 | ||||||
Goodwill |
13,738 | 13,738 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
15,798 | 16,014 | ||||||
Restricted certificates of deposit |
175 | 175 | ||||||
Other assets |
32 | 26 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 65,433 | $ | 62,493 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 3,280 | $ | 2,032 | ||||
Accrued wages and benefits |
1,745 | 2,781 | ||||||
Accrued rent |
515 | 521 | ||||||
Accrued professional fees |
774 | 717 | ||||||
Accrued sales commissions |
422 | 529 | ||||||
Customer deposits and deferred revenue |
769 | 886 | ||||||
Domestic and foreign income taxes payable |
1,773 | 1,199 | ||||||
Earnout payable |
5,833 | 5,355 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
527 | 399 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
15,638 | 14,419 | ||||||
Federal transition tax payable, net of current portion |
436 | 436 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
2,539 | 2,606 | ||||||
Contingent consideration liability, net of current portion |
6,992 | 5,744 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
25,605 | 23,205 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders' equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
- | - | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 10,506,635 and 10,427,435 shares issued, respectively |
105 | 104 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
25,980 | 25,860 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
13,027 | 12,646 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings |
920 | 882 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 33,077 shares |
(204 | ) |
(204 | ) |
||||
Total stockholders' equity |
39,828 | 39,288 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$ | 65,433 | $ | 62,493 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 18,871 | $ | 14,180 | ||||
Cost of revenues |
9,476 | 6,452 | ||||||
Gross margin |
9,395 | 7,728 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Selling expense |
2,476 | 1,668 | ||||||
Engineering and product development expense |
1,296 | 935 | ||||||
General and administrative expense |
2,990 | 1,994 | ||||||
Adjustment to contingent consideration liability |
1,726 | - | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
8,488 | 4,597 | ||||||
Operating income |
907 | 3,131 | ||||||
Other income |
75 | 41 | ||||||
Earnings before income tax expense |
982 | 3,172 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
601 | 1,094 | ||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 381 | $ | 2,078 | ||||
Net earnings per common share - basic |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.20 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic |
10,326,309 | 10,264,565 | ||||||
Net earnings per common share - diluted |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.20 | ||||
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding - diluted |
10,365,306 | 10,295,337 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 381 | $ | 2,078 | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
38 | 28 | ||||||
Comprehensive earnings |
$ | 419 | $ | 2,106 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
Accumulated |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional |
Other |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
Paid-in |
Retained |
Comprehensive |
Treasury |
Stockholders' |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Amount |
Capital |
Earnings |
Earnings |
Stock |
Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2018 |
10,427,435 | $ | 104 | $ | 25,860 | $ | 12,646 | $ | 882 | $ | (204 | ) |
$ | 39,288 | ||||||||||||||
Net earnings |
- | - | - | 381 | - | - | 381 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
- | - | - | - | 38 | - | 38 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation related to stock-based awards |
- | - | 121 | - | - | - | 121 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of unvested shares of restricted stock |
79,200 | 1 | (1 | ) |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2018 |
10,506,635 | $ | 105 | $ | 25,980 | $ | 13,027 | $ | 920 | $ | (204 | ) |
$ | 39,828 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
inTEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 381 | $ | 2,078 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
405 | 150 | ||||||
Adjustment to earnout payable |
478 | - | ||||||
Adjustment to contingent consideration liability |
1,248 | - | ||||||
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory |
61 | 47 | ||||||
Foreign exchange gain |
(74 | ) |
(12 | ) |
||||
Amortization of deferred compensation related to stock-based awards |
121 | 88 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
11 | - | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of demonstration equipment, net of gain |
101 | 31 | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
(67 | ) |
(6 | ) |
||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
723 | (4,423 | ) |
|||||
Inventories |
(1,760 | ) |
(291 | ) |
||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(80 | ) |
(31 | ) |
||||
Other assets |
(6 | ) |
(5 | ) |
||||
Accounts payable |
1,248 | 465 | ||||||
Accrued wages and benefits |
(1,037 | ) |
(400 | ) |
||||
Accrued rent |
(6 | ) |
(28 | ) |
||||
Accrued professional fees |
57 | (11 | ) |
|||||
Accrued sales commissions |
(107 | ) |
148 | |||||
Customer deposits and deferred revenue |
(121 | ) |
85 | |||||
Domestic and foreign income taxes payable |
575 | 1,050 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
128 | 65 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
2,279 | (1,000 | ) |
|||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(1,168 | ) |
(114 | ) |
||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,168 | ) |
(114 | ) |
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Repurchases of common stock |
- | (62 | ) |
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
- | (62 | ) |
|||||
Effects of exchange rates on cash |
37 | 20 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) all activities |
1,148 | (1,156 | ) |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
13,290 | 28,611 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 14,438 | $ | 27,455 | ||||
Cash payments for: |
||||||||
Domestic and foreign income taxes |
$ | 110 | $ | 39 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
inTEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(1) |
NATURE OF OPERATIONS |
We are an independent designer, manufacturer and marketer of thermal management products and semiconductor automated test equipment (“ATE”) interface solutions. Our products are used by semiconductor manufacturers to perform development, qualifying and final testing of integrated circuits (“ICs”) and wafers, and for other electronic testing across a range of industries including the automotive, defense/aerospace, energy, industrial and telecommunications markets. We also offer induction heating products for joining and forming metals in a variety of industrial markets, including automotive, aerospace, machinery, wire & fasteners, medical, semiconductor, food & beverage, and packaging. We manufacture our products in the U.S. Marketing and support activities are conducted worldwide from our facilities in the U.S., Germany, Singapore, the Netherlands and the U.K. The consolidated entity is comprised of inTEST Corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have two reportable segments, which are also our reporting units, Thermal Products ("Thermal") and Electromechanical Semiconductor Products ("EMS").
On May 24, 2017, we completed the acquisition of Ambrell Corporation ("Ambrell"). The acquisition was completed by acquiring all of the outstanding capital stock of Ambrell. Ambrell is a manufacturer of precision induction heating systems which are used to conduct fast, efficient, repeatable non-contact heating of metals or other electrically conductive materials, in order to transform raw materials into finished parts. The Ambrell acquisition complements our current thermal technologies and broadens our diverse customer base, allowing expansion within many non-semiconductor related markets, such as consumer product packaging, fiber-optics, automotive and other markets. Ambrell's operations are included in our Thermal segment. Ambrell manufactures its products in the U.S. and conducts marketing and support activities from its facilities in the U.S., the Netherlands and the U.K. This acquisition is discussed further in Note 3.
The ATE market in which we operate is characterized by rapid technological change, competitive pricing pressures and cyclical as well as seasonal market patterns. This market is subject to significant economic downturns at various times. Our financial results are affected by a wide variety of factors, including, but not limited to, general economic conditions worldwide and in the markets in which we operate, economic conditions specific to the ATE market and the other markets we serve, our ability to safeguard patented technology and intellectual property in a rapidly evolving market, downward pricing pressures from customers, and our reliance on a relatively few number of customers for a significant portion of our sales. In addition, we are exposed to the risk of obsolescence of our inventory depending on the mix of future business and technological changes within the markets that we serve. We also continue to implement an acquisition strategy that may cause us to incur substantial expense in reviewing and evaluating potential transactions. We may or may not be successful in locating suitable businesses to acquire. In addition, we may not be able to successfully integrate any business we do acquire with our existing business and we may not be able to operate the acquired business profitably. As a result of these or other factors, we may experience significant period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results.
(2) |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of our accounts, including inventories, long-lived assets, goodwill, identifiable intangibles, contingent consideration liabilities and deferred tax assets and liabilities, including related valuation allowances, are particularly impacted by estimates.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and changes in cash flows for the interim periods presented. Certain footnote information has been condensed or omitted from these consolidated financial statements. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (“2017 Form 10-K”) filed on March 28, 2018 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Reclassification
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to be comparable with the current period's presentation.
Business Combinations
Acquired businesses are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, which requires that the purchase price be allocated to the net assets acquired at their respective fair values. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Fair values of intangible assets are estimated by valuation models prepared by our management and third party advisors. The assets purchased and liabilities assumed have been reflected in our consolidated balance sheets, and the results are included in the consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of cash flows from the date of acquisition. Any change in the fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date, including changes from events after the acquisition date, will be recognized within general and administrative expense in the period of the estimated fair value change. Acquisition-related transaction costs, including legal and accounting fees and other external costs directly related to the acquisition, are recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Fair Value Measurements
The fair values of our financial instruments reflect the amounts that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price).
The carrying amounts of our financial instruments of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
We carry our contingent consideration liability at fair value. In accordance with the three-tier fair value hierarchy, we determined the fair value of our contingent consideration liability using an option-based income approach with a Monte Carlo simulation model. The income approach uses Level 3, or unobservable inputs, as defined under the accounting guidance for fair value measurements. See Notes 3 and 4 for more information regarding our contingent consideration liability.
Goodwill, Intangible and Long-Lived Assets
We account for goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350 (Intangibles - Goodwill and Other). Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful economic life and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Goodwill is assessed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter on a reporting unit basis, or more frequently when events and circumstances occur indicating that the recorded goodwill may be impaired. As a part of the goodwill impairment assessment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the qualitative assessment indicates a potential impairment, we are required to perform a two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized. The two-step test is discussed below. If we determine that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amounts, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required.
If we determine it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a result of our qualitative assessment, we will perform a quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test. In the Step I test, the fair value of a reporting unit is computed and compared with its book value. If the book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a Step II test is performed in which the implied fair value of goodwill is compared with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recorded in an amount equal to that excess. The two-step goodwill impairment assessment is based upon a combination of the income approach, which estimates the fair value of our reporting units based upon a discounted cash flow approach, and the market approach which estimates the fair value of our reporting units based upon comparable market multiples. This fair value is then reconciled to our market capitalization at year end with an appropriate control premium. The determination of the fair value of our reporting units requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions including the selection of appropriate peer group companies, control premiums, discount rate, terminal growth rates, and forecasts of revenue and expense growth rates, income tax rates, changes in working capital, depreciation, amortization and capital expenditures. Changes in assumptions concerning future financial results or other underlying assumptions could have a significant impact on either the fair value of the reporting unit or the amount of the goodwill impairment charge.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. As a part of the impairment assessment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, as a result of our qualitative assessment, we determine that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. If we choose not to perform a qualitative assessment, then the quantitative impairment test is required. The quantitative impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
Long-lived assets, which consist of finite-lived intangible assets and property and equipment, are assessed for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate. Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the estimated undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value of the asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value. The cash flow estimates used to determine the impairment, if any, contain management's best estimates using appropriate assumptions and projections at that time.
Revenue Recognition
As discussed further under “Effect of Recently Adopted Amendments to Authoritative Accounting Guidance” below, effective January 1, 2018, we recognize revenue in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 606 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers). We recognize revenue for the sale of products or services when our performance obligations under the terms of a contract with a customer are satisfied and control of the product or service has been transferred to the customer. Generally this occurs when we ship a product or perform a service. In certain cases, recognition of revenue is deferred until the product is received by the customer or at some other point in the future when we have determined that we have satisfied our performance obligations under the contract. Our contracts with customers may include a combination of products and services, which are generally capable of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. In addition to the sale of products and services, we also lease certain of our equipment under short-term lease agreements. We recognize revenue from equipment leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Revenue is recorded in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those products or services. We do not have any material variable consideration arrangements or any material payment terms with our customers other than standard net 30 or net 60 day payment terms. We generally do not provide a right of return to our customers. Revenue is recognized net of any taxes collected from customers, which are subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.
Nature of Products and Services
We sell thermal management products and semiconductor ATE interface solutions. Our thermal management products include ThermoStreams, ThermoChambers, ThermoChucks and process chillers which we sell under our Temptronic, Sigma and Thermonics product lines, and Ambrell’s precision induction heating systems, including EkoHeat and EasyHeat products. Our semiconductor ATE interface solutions include manipulators, docking hardware and electrical interface products. We provide post-warranty service for the equipment we sell. We sell semiconductor ATE interface solutions and certain thermal management products to the ATE market, which provides automated test equipment to the semiconductor market. We also sell our thermal products to markets outside the semiconductor market which include the automotive, defense/aerospace, industrial, telecommunications and other markets.
We lease certain of our equipment under short-term leasing agreements with original lease terms of 6 months or less. Our lease agreements do not contain purchase options.
Types of Contracts with Customers
Our contracts with customers are generally structured as individual purchase orders which specify the exact products or services being sold or equipment being leased along with the selling price, service fee or monthly lease amount for each individual item on the purchase order. Payment terms and any other customer-specific acceptance criteria are also specified on the purchase order. We generally do not have any customer-specific acceptance criteria, other than that the product performs within the agreed upon specifications. We test all products manufactured as part of our quality assurance process to determine that they comply with specifications prior to shipment to a customer.
Contract Balances
We record accounts receivable at the time of invoicing. Accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, is included in current assets on our balance sheet. To the extent that we do not recognize revenue at the same time as we invoice, we record a liability for deferred revenue. In certain instances, we also receive customer deposits in advance of invoicing and recording of accounts receivable. Deferred revenue and customer deposits are included in current liabilities on our balance sheets.
The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance. We determine the allowance based on known troubled accounts, if any, historical experience, and other currently available evidence.
Costs to Obtain a Contract with a Customer
The only costs we incur associated with obtaining contracts with customers are sales commissions that we pay to our internal sales personnel or third-party sales representatives. These costs are calculated based on an established percentage of the selling price of each product or service sold. Commissions are considered earned by our internal sales personnel either at the time of receipt of our customer’s purchase order, in the case of Ambrell, or at the time we recognize revenue for a particular transaction, in the case of our remaining operations. Commissions are considered earned by third-party sales representatives at the time that revenue is recognized for a particular transaction. We record commission expense in our consolidated statements of operations at the time the commission is earned. Commissions earned but not yet paid are included in current liabilities on our balance sheets.
Refer to Notes 6 and 12 for further information about our revenue from contracts with customers.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at cost on a first-in, first-out basis, not in excess of market value. Cash flows from the sale of inventories are recorded in operating cash flows. On a quarterly basis, we review our inventories and record excess and obsolete inventory charges based upon our established objective excess and obsolete inventory criteria. These criteria identify material that has not been used in a work order during the prior twelve months and the quantity of material on hand that is greater than the average annual usage of that material over the prior three years. In certain cases, additional excess and obsolete inventory charges are recorded based upon current market conditions, anticipated product life cycles, new product introductions and expected future use of the inventory. The excess and obsolete inventory charges we record establish a new cost basis for the related inventories. We incurred excess and obsolete inventory charges of $61 and $47 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718 (Compensation - Stock Compensation), which requires that employee share-based equity awards be accounted for under the fair value method and requires the use of an option pricing model for estimating fair value of stock options granted, which is then amortized to expense over the service periods. See further disclosures related to our stock-based compensation plan in Note 10.
Subsequent Events
We have made an assessment of our operations and determined that there were no material subsequent events requiring adjustment to, or disclosure in, our consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
Product Warranties
We generally provide product warranties and record estimated warranty expense at the time of sale based upon historical claims experience. Warranty expense is included in selling expense in our consolidated statements of operations.
Income Taxes
The asset and liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.
Net Earnings Per Common Share
Net earnings per common share - basic is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Net earnings per common share - diluted is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during each period. Common share equivalents represent unvested shares of restricted stock and stock options and are calculated using the treasury stock method. Common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation if their effect is anti-dilutive.
The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, a reconciliation of weighted average common shares outstanding - basic to weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding - diluted and the average number of potentially dilutive securities that were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect was anti-dilutive:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic |
10,326,309 | 10,264,565 | ||||||
Potentially dilutive securities: |
||||||||
Unvested shares of restricted stock and stock options |
38,997 | 30,772 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding - diluted |
10,365,306 | 10,295,337 | ||||||
Average number of potentially dilutive securities excluded from calculation |
103,756 | 47,260 |
Effect of Recently Adopted Amendments to Authoritative Accounting Guidance
In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance on the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. Subsequent to May 2014, the FASB issued additional clarifying guidance on certain aspects of this new guidance. This new guidance is presented in ASC Topic 606 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers) and replaced most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it became effective, which for us was on January 1, 2018. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we completed our review of all our revenue streams to identify any differences in timing, measurement or presentation of revenue recognition. This review included the types of revenue arrangements currently in place including a review of individual customer contracts related to each of our major revenue streams. Based on the results of our assessment, we concluded that the implementation of this new guidance would not have a significant impact on the timing or amount of revenue we recognize in any given period in comparison to the amount recognized under prior guidance. In addition, based on our assessment, we determined that we did not need to implement any major changes to existing accounting systems or internal controls. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method which allowed us to make a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings for any differences in the amounts of revenue or expenses that would have been recognized in prior periods, had this new guidance been in place at that time, rather than retrospectively adjusting those prior periods. However, the implementation of this new guidance did not have any impact on our results of operations or our consolidated balance sheet as of the implementation date, as the timing and amount of revenue we recognized in prior periods did not change under the new guidance. See Notes 6 and 12 for additional disclosures about our revenue from contracts with customers.
In November 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the guidance on presentation of restricted cash within the statement of cash flows. The amendments require that restricted cash be included within cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. The amendments were effective for us as of January 1, 2018, and have been applied retrospectively. The implementation of these amendments did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued amendments to clarify the current guidance on the definition of a business. The objective of the amendments is to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments were effective for us as of January 1, 2018. The implementation of these amendments did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued amendments to the guidance on accounting for a change to the terms or conditions (modification) of a share-based payment award. The amendments provide that an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value and vesting conditions of the modified award and the classification of the modified award (equity or liability instrument) are the same as the original award immediately before the modification. The amendments were effective for us as of January 1, 2018. The amendments are to be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The implementation of these amendments did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Effect of Recently Issued Amendments to Authoritative Accounting Guidance
In January 2017, the FASB issued amendments to the guidance on accounting for goodwill impairment. The amendments simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment by removing Step II of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Under the amendments, a goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The amendments will be applied prospectively and are effective for us as of January 1, 2020, with early application permitted beginning January 1, 2017. We do not expect the implementation of these amendments to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the current guidance on accounting for lease transactions, which is presented in ASC Topic 842 (Leases). Subsequent to February 2016, the FASB has issued additional clarifying guidance on certain aspects of this new guidance. The intent of the updated guidance is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring lessees to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by leases and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The amendments are effective for us as of January 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we performed a preliminary assessment of the impact that the implementation of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements. Our assessment is ongoing. We currently expect that the implementation of this new guidance will have a significant impact on our consolidated balance sheet as a result of recording right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all of our multi-year leases. Under current guidance, none of these leases has any related asset or liability recorded on our balance sheet. We do not currently expect that the implementation of this new guidance will have a significant impact on our pattern of expense recognition for any of our multi-year leases. However, we are still in the process of completing our assessment and our conclusions about the impact that this new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements may change as we complete our assessment over the next several quarters.
(3) |
ACQUISITION |
On May 24, 2017, we completed our acquisition of Ambrell, a manufacturer of precision induction heating systems. Ambrell's systems are used to conduct fast, efficient, repeatable non-contact heating of metals or other electrically conductive materials, in order to transform raw materials into finished parts. The Ambrell acquisition complements our current thermal technologies and broadens our diverse customer base, allowing expansion within many non-semiconductor related markets, such as consumer product packaging, fiber-optics, automotive and other markets.
The purchase price for Ambrell was $22,000 in cash paid at closing, subject to a customary post-closing working capital adjustment. Additional consideration in the form of earnouts may be paid based upon a multiple of adjusted EBITDA for 2017 and 2018, as further discussed below. The acquisition was completed by acquiring all of the outstanding capital stock of Ambrell. Total acquisition costs incurred to complete this transaction were $935. Acquisition costs were expensed as incurred and included in general and administrative expense.
The acquisition of Ambrell has been accounted for as a business combination using purchase accounting, and, accordingly, the results of Ambrell have been included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition. The allocation of the Ambrell purchase price was based on fair values as of May 24, 2017. The determination of fair value reflects our estimates and assumptions based on the information available as of the date the estimate is calculated.
The excess of the purchase price over the identifiable intangible and net tangible assets was allocated to goodwill and is not deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill is attributed to synergies that are expected to result from the operations of the combined businesses.
The total purchase price of $26,733 was comprised of:
Cash paid to acquire the capital stock of Ambrell |
$ | 22,610 | ||
Estimated fair value of contingent consideration |
4,123 | |||
Total purchase price |
$ | 26,733 |
As noted above, the consideration paid for the acquisition of Ambrell includes contingent consideration in the form of earnouts based on the future adjusted EBITDA of Ambrell. Adjusted EBITDA is earnings (or loss) from operations before interest expense, benefit or provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and excludes other non-recurring income and expense items as defined in the stock purchase agreement for Ambrell. The first earnout, to be paid after calendar year 2017 was completed, was an amount equal to 8x Ambrell's adjusted EBITDA for 2017 minus the $22,000 paid at closing. At March 31, 2018, we had accrued $5,833 as earnout payable representing the amount of the first earnout. This amount was paid in April 2018. The second earnout, if any, to be paid after calendar year 2018 is completed, will be an amount equal to 8x Ambrell's adjusted EBITDA for 2018 minus the sum of the $22,000 paid at closing and $5,833, the earnout paid with respect to 2017. The 2017 and 2018 earnouts, in the aggregate, are capped at $18,000. To estimate the fair value of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date and at the end of each quarter, an option based income approach using a Monte Carlo simulation model is utilized due to the non-linear payout structure. As of the acquisition date, this resulted in an estimated fair value of $4,123 for the 2017 and 2018 earnouts. This amount was recorded as a contingent consideration liability and included in the purchase price as of the acquisition date. At March 31, 2018, this same approach resulted in an estimated fair value of $6,992 for the 2018 earnout which is recorded as a contingent consideration liability on our balance sheet. Changes in the amount of the estimated fair value of the earnouts since the acquisition date are recorded as operating expenses in our statement of operations in the quarter in which they occur.
The total purchase price of $26,733 has been allocated as follows:
Goodwill |
$ | 12,032 | ||
Identifiable intangible assets |
16,300 | |||
Tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed: |
||||
Cash |
648 | |||
Trade accounts receivable |
3,621 | |||
Inventories |
1,917 | |||
Other current assets |
200 | |||
Property and equipment |
614 | |||
Accounts payable |
(1,420 | ) |
||
Accrued expenses |
(1,280 | ) |
||
Customer advances |
(554 | ) |
||
Deferred tax liability |
(5,345 | ) |
||
Total purchase price |
$ | 26,733 |
We estimated the fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired using a combination of the income, cost and market approaches. Identifiable intangible assets acquired include customer relationships, customer backlog, technology and trademarks. We generally amortize our finite-lived intangible assets over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis, unless an alternate amortization method can be reliably determined. Any such alternate amortization method would be based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are expected to be consumed.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of Ambrell's identifiable intangible assets and their estimated useful lives as of the acquisition date:
|
Weighted |
|||||||
(in years) |
||||||||
Finite-lived intangible assets: |
||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 9,000 | 9.0 | |||||
Technology |
600 | 9.0 | ||||||
Customer backlog |
500 | 0.3 | ||||||
Total finite-lived intangible assets |
10,100 | 8.6 | ||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: |
||||||||
Trademarks |
6,200 | |||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ | 16,300 |
The following unaudited pro forma information gives effect to the acquisition of Ambrell as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2017. This proforma summary information does not reflect any operating efficiencies or costs savings that may be achieved by the combined businesses. It is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations would have been had the acquisition taken place as of that date, nor is it indicative of future consolidated results of operations:
Three |
||||||||
2017 |
||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 18,792 | ||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 1,660 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.16 |
The pro forma results shown above do not reflect the impact on general and administrative expense of investment advisory costs, legal costs and other costs of $935 incurred by us as a direct result of the transaction.
(4) |
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
ASC Topic 820 (Fair Value Measurement) establishes a fair value hierarchy for instruments measured at fair value that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and our own assumptions (unobservable inputs). Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
ASC 820 identifies fair value as the exchange price, or exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy that distinguishes among the following:
Level 1 |
Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. |
|
|
Level 2 |
Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and models for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. |
|
|
Level 3 |
Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. |
To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by us in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The contingent consideration liability on our balance sheets is measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs. Our contingent consideration liability is a result of our acquisition of Ambrell on May 24, 2017, and it represents the estimated fair value of the additional cash consideration payable that is contingent upon the achievement of certain financial results by Ambrell in 2018, as discussed more fully in Note 3. The fair value of this Level 3 instrument involves generating various scenarios for projected adjusted EBITDA over a specified time period, calculating the associated contingent consideration payments and discounting the average payments to present value. During the first quarter of 2018, we recorded a $1,726 increase in the fair value of our contingent consideration liability, primarily as a result of an increase in the projected adjusted EBITDA of Ambrell for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Amounts at |
Fair Value Measurement Using |
|||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
|||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2018 |
||||||||||||||||
Contingent consideration liability |
$ | 6,992 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 6,992 |
Changes in the fair value of our Level 3 contingent consideration liability for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were as follows:
Three Months |
||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 5,744 | ||
Fair value adjustment |
1,726 | |||
Transfer of contingent consideration liability to earnout payable |
(478 | ) |
||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 6,992 |
(5) |
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
Goodwill and intangible assets on our balance sheets are the result of our acquisitions of Sigma Systems Corp. ("Sigma") in October 2008, Thermonics, Inc. ("Thermonics") in January 2012 and Ambrell in May 2017. All of our goodwill and intangible assets are allocated to our Thermal segment. Goodwill totaled $13,738 at each of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
Intangible Assets
Changes in the amount of the carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are as follows:
Balance - January 1, 2018 |
$ | 9,304 | ||
Amortization |
(216 | ) |
||
Balance March 31, 2018 |
$ | 9,088 |
The following tables provide further detail about our intangible assets as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
March 31, 2018 |
||||||||||||
Gross |
Amortization |
Net |
||||||||||
Finite-lived intangible assets: |
||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 10,480 | $ | 1,986 | $ | 8,494 | ||||||
Technology |
600 | 136 | 464 | |||||||||
Patents |
590 | 473 | 117 | |||||||||
Software |
270 | 257 | 13 | |||||||||
Trade name |
140 | 140 | - | |||||||||
Customer backlog |
500 | 500 | - | |||||||||
Total finite-lived intangible assets |
12,580 | 3,492 | 9,088 | |||||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: |
||||||||||||
Trademarks |
6,710 | - | 6,710 | |||||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ | 19,290 | $ | 3,492 | $ | 15,798 |
December 31, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Amortization |
Net Amount |
||||||||||
Finite-lived intangible assets: |
||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 10,480 | $ | 1,828 | $ | 8,652 | ||||||
Technology |
600 | 95 | 505 | |||||||||
Patents |
590 | 463 | 127 | |||||||||
Software |
270 | 250 | 20 | |||||||||
Trade name |
140 | 140 | - | |||||||||
Customer backlog |
500 | 500 | - | |||||||||
Total finite-lived intangible assets |
12,580 | 3,276 | 9,304 | |||||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: |
||||||||||||
Trademarks |
6,710 | - | 6,710 | |||||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ | 19,290 | $ | 3,276 | $ | 16,014 |
We generally amortize our finite-lived intangible assets over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis, unless an alternate amortization method can be reliably determined. Any such alternate amortization method would be based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are expected to be consumed. None of our intangible assets have any residual value.
Total amortization expense for our finite-lived intangible assets was $216 and $53, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. The following table sets forth the estimated annual amortization expense for each of the next five years:
2018 (remainder) |
$ | 887 | ||
2019 |
$ | 1,257 | ||
2020 |
$ | 1,233 | ||
2021 |
$ | 1,227 | ||
2022 |
$ | 1,167 |
(6) |
REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS |
Changes in the amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are as follows:
Balance - January 1, 2018 |
$ | 213 | ||
Bad debt recovery |
(39 | ) |
||
Write-offs |
(22 | ) |
||
Balance - March 31, 2018 |
$ | 152 |
The following tables provide additional information about our revenue from contracts with customers, including revenue by customer and product type and revenue by market. See also Note 12 for information about revenue by operating segment and geographic region.
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
Net revenues by customer type: |
||||||||
End user |
$ | 16,328 | $ | 12,486 | ||||
OEM/Integrator |
2,543 | 1,694 | ||||||
$ | 18,871 | $ | 14,180 | |||||
Net revenues by product type: |
||||||||
Thermal test |
$ | 6,032 | $ | 6,822 | ||||
Induction heating |
5,622 | - | ||||||
Semiconductor production test |
5,339 | 6,162 | ||||||
Service/other |
1,878 | 1,196 | ||||||
$ | 18,871 | $ | 14,180 | |||||
Net revenues by market: |
||||||||
Semiconductor |
$ | 10,539 | $ | 10,439 | ||||
Industrial |
5,653 | 120 | ||||||
Telecommunications |
1,279 | 2,695 | ||||||
Other non-semiconductor markets |
1,400 | 926 | ||||||
$ | 18,871 | $ | 14,180 |
(7) |
MAJOR CUSTOMERS |
During the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, Texas Instruments Incorporated accounted for 11% and 13% of our consolidated net revenues, respectively. While both of our segments sold to this customer, these revenues were primarily generated by our EMS segment. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, Hakuto Co., Ltd., one of our distributors, accounted for 13% of our consolidated net revenues. These revenues were generated by our Thermal segment. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated net revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.
(8) |
INVENTORIES |
Inventories held at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were comprised of the following:
March 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 4,644 | $ | 3,424 | ||||
Work in process |
1,179 | 791 | ||||||
Inventory consigned to others |
75 | 64 | ||||||
Finished goods |
770 | 687 | ||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 6,668 | $ | 4,966 |
(9) |
DEBT |
Letters of Credit
We have issued letters of credit as the security deposits for certain of our domestic leases. These letters of credit are secured by pledged certificates of deposit which are classified as Restricted Certificates of Deposit on our balance sheets. The terms of our leases require us to renew these letters of credit at least 30 days prior to their expiration dates for successive terms of not less than one year until lease expiration. Our outstanding letters of credit at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted of the following:
Letters of Credit |
|||||||||||||
Original L/C |
L/C |
Lease |
March 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||||
Mt. Laurel, NJ |
3/29/2010 |
3/31/2019 |
4/30/2021 |
$ | 125 | $ | 125 | ||||||
Mansfield, MA |
10/27/2010 |
11/08/2018 |
8/23/2021 |
50 | 50 | ||||||||
$ | 175 | $ | 175 |
(10) |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
As of March 31, 2018, we have unvested restricted stock awards and stock options granted under stock-based compensation plans that are described more fully in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2017 Form 10-K.
As of March 31, 2018, total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards and stock options was $1,511. The weighted average period over which this expense is expected to be recognized is 3.3 years. The following table shows the allocation of the compensation expense we recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to stock-based compensation:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
Cost of revenues |
$ | - | $ | 3 | ||||
Selling expense |
- | - | ||||||
Engineering and product development expense |
1 | 3 | ||||||
General and administrative expense |
120 | 82 | ||||||
$ | 121 | $ | 88 |
There was no stock-based compensation expense capitalized in the three months ended March 31, 2018 or 2017.
Restricted Stock Awards
We record compensation expense for restricted stock awards based on the quoted market price of our stock at the grant date and amortize the expense over the vesting period. Restricted stock awards generally vest over four years. However, in March 2018 and 2017, we granted 32,000 and 22,500 shares of restricted stock, respectively, to our independent directors. These shares vest 25% at each of March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 of the year in which they were granted. The total compensation expense related to these shares is $270 and $143, respectively, and is recorded as the shares vest.
The following table summarizes the activity related to unvested shares of restricted stock for the three months ended March 31, 2018:
|
Weighted |
|||||||
Unvested shares outstanding, January 1, 2018 |
75,225 | $ | 5.29 | |||||
Granted |
79,200 | 8.45 | ||||||
Vested |
(21,200 | ) |
6.92 | |||||
Forfeited |
- | - | ||||||
Unvested shares outstanding, March 31, 2018 |
133,225 | 6.99 |
The total fair value of the shares that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was $169 and $105, respectively, as of the vesting dates of these shares.
Stock Options
We record compensation expense for stock options based on the fair market value of the options as of the grant date. No option may be granted with an exercise period in excess of ten years from the date of grant. Generally, stock options will be granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant and will vest over four years.
The fair value for stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.70 | % |
2.14 | % |
||||
Dividend yield |
0.00 | % |
0.00 | % |
||||
Expected common stock market price volatility factor |
.39 | .39 | ||||||
Weighted average expected life of stock options (years) |
6.25 | 6.25 |
The per share weighted average fair value of stock options issued during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was $3.61 and $2.64, respectively.
The following table summarizes the activity related to stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2018:
|
Weighted |
|||||||
Options outstanding, January 1, 2018 (4,950 exercisable) |
76,400 | $ | 5.98 | |||||
Granted |
140,700 | 8.45 | ||||||
Exercised |
- | - | ||||||
Forfeited |
- | - | ||||||
Options outstanding, March 31, 2018 (22,700 exercisable) |
217,100 | 7.58 |
(11) |
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS |
We have defined contribution 401(k) plans for our employees who work in the U.S. All permanent employees of inTEST Corporation, Temptronic Corporation (“Temptronic”) and inTEST Silicon Valley Corporation who are at least 18 years of age are eligible to participate in the inTEST Corporation Incentive Savings Plan. We match employee contributions dollar for dollar up to 10% of the employee's annual compensation, with a maximum limit of $5. Employer contributions vest ratably over four years. Matching contributions are discretionary. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, we recorded $121 and $163 of expense for matching contributions, respectively.
All permanent employees of Ambrell are immediately eligible to participate in the Ambrell Corporation Savings & Profit Sharing Plan (the "Ambrell Plan") upon employment and are eligible for employer matching contributions after completing one year of service, as defined in the Ambrell Plan. The Ambrell Plan allows eligible employees to make voluntary contributions up to 100% of compensation, up to the federal government contribution limits. We will make a matching contribution of 25% of each employee's contributions up to a maximum of 2% of such employee's annual compensation. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, we made matching contributions of $26.
(12) |
SEGMENT INFORMATION |
We have two reportable segments, which are also our reporting units, Thermal and EMS.
Thermal includes the operations of Temptronic, Thermonics, Sigma, inTEST Thermal Solutions GmbH (Germany), inTEST Pte, Limited (Singapore) and Ambrell, which we acquired in May 2017, as discussed in Note 3. Sales of this segment consist primarily of temperature management systems which we design, manufacture and market under our Temptronic, Thermonics and Sigma product lines, and precision induction heating systems which are designed, manufactured and marketed by Ambrell. In addition, this segment provides post-warranty service and support.
EMS includes the operations of our manufacturing facilities in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey and Fremont, California. Sales of this segment consist primarily of manipulator, docking hardware and tester interface products, which we design, manufacture and market.
We operate our business worldwide and sell our products both domestically and internationally. Both of our segments sell to semiconductor manufacturers, third-party test and assembly houses, ATE manufacturers and integrators. Thermal also sells into a variety of markets outside of the semiconductor market, including the automotive, consumer electronics, consumer product packaging, defense/aerospace, energy, fiber optics, industrial, telecommunications and other markets.
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
Net Revenues: |
||||||||
Thermal |
$ | 13,234 | $ | 7,776 | ||||
EMS |
5,637 | 6,404 | ||||||
$ | 18,871 | $ | 14,180 | |||||
Earnings (loss) before income tax expense (benefit): |
||||||||
Thermal |
$ | (92 | ) |
$ | 1,846 | |||
EMS |
1,292 | 1,698 | ||||||
Corporate |
(218 | ) |
(372 | ) |
||||
$ | 982 | $ | 3,172 | |||||
Net earnings (loss): |
||||||||
Thermal |
$ | (455 | ) |
$ | 1,210 | |||
EMS |
1,005 | 1,112 | ||||||
Corporate |
(169 | ) |
(244 | ) |
||||
$ | 381 | $ | 2,078 |
March 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
Identifiable assets: |
||||||||
Thermal |
$ | 50,412 | $ | 50,408 | ||||
EMS |
15,021 | 12,085 | ||||||
$ | 65,433 | $ | 62,493 |
The following table provides information about our geographic areas of operation. Net revenues from unaffiliated customers are based on the location to which the goods are shipped.
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
|||||||
Net revenues: |
||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 6,543 | $ | 2,886 | ||||
Foreign |
12,328 | 11,294 | ||||||
$ | 18,871 | $ | 14,180 |
March 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
Property and equipment: |
||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 1,967 | $ | 991 | ||||
Foreign |
436 | 550 | ||||||
$ | 2,403 | $ | 1,541 |
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this report and management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) contains statements relating to possible future events and results that are considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "intends," "may," "will," "should," “plans” or "anticipates" or similar terminology. See Part I, Item 1 - "Business - Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for examples of statements made in this report which may be "forward-looking statements." These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on various assumptions. Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, investors and prospective investors are cautioned that such statements are only projections, and there cannot be any assurance that these events or results will occur. We undertake no obligation to update the information in this report and MD&A to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Information about the primary risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from our historic results or the results described in the forward-looking statements made in this report or presented elsewhere by management from time to time are included in Part I, Item 1A - "Risk Factors" in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Material changes to such risk factors may be reported in subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q in Part II, Item 1A. There have been no such changes from the risk factors set forth in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Overview
This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Our business and results of operations are substantially dependent upon the demand for ATE by semiconductor manufacturers and companies that specialize in the testing of ICs. As further discussed below, on May 24, 2017, we acquired Ambrell, which sells its products almost exclusively to customers in the industrial market, which is a non-semiconductor market. We expect that the acquisition of Ambrell will significantly reduce our dependence on customers in the semiconductor market. We expect that our future orders and net revenues will be approximately equally split between the semiconductor and non-semiconductor markets. Demand for ATE is driven by semiconductor manufacturers that are opening new, or expanding existing, semiconductor fabrication facilities or upgrading equipment, which in turn is dependent upon the current and anticipated market demand for semiconductors and products incorporating semiconductors. Such market demand can be the result of market expansion, development of new technologies or redesigned products to incorporate new features, or the replacement of aging equipment. In addition, we continue to focus on design improvements and new approaches for our own products which contribute to our net revenues as our customers adopt these new products.
In the past, the semiconductor market has been highly cyclical with recurring periods of oversupply, which often have a severe impact on the semiconductor market's demand for ATE, including the products we manufacture. This cyclicality can cause wide fluctuations in both our orders and net revenues and, depending on our ability to react quickly to these shifts in demand, can significantly impact our results of operations. Semiconductor and ATE market cycles are difficult to predict and in recent years have become more volatile and, in certain cases, shorter in duration. Because the market cycles are generally characterized by sequential periods of growth or declines in orders and net revenues during each cycle, year over year comparisons of operating results may not always be as meaningful as comparisons of periods at similar points in either up or down cycles. In addition, during both downward and upward cycles in our market, in any given quarter, the trend in both our orders and net revenues can be erratic. This can occur, for example, when orders are canceled or currently scheduled delivery dates are accelerated or postponed by a significant customer or when customer forecasts and general business conditions fluctuate during a quarter.
In addition to being cyclical, the ATE market has also developed a seasonal pattern in the last several years, with the second and third quarters being the periods of strong demand and the first and fourth quarters being periods of weakened demand. We believe this change has been driven by the strong demand for consumer products containing semiconductor content sold during the year-end holiday shopping season.
Third-party market share statistics are not available for the products we manufacture and sell into the ATE market; therefore, comparisons of period over period changes in our market share are not easily determined. As a result, it is difficult to ascertain if ATE market volatility in any period is the result of macro-economic or customer-specific factors impacting ATE market demand, or if we have gained or lost market share to a competitor during the period.
As part of our ongoing strategy to reduce the impact of semiconductor and ATE market volatility on our business operations, we continue to diversify our served markets to address the thermal test requirements of several other markets outside the semiconductor market. These include the automotive, consumer electronics, consumer product packaging, defense/aerospace, energy, fiber optics, industrial, telecommunications and other markets. We believe that these markets usually are less cyclical than the semiconductor and ATE markets. While market share statistics exist for some of the markets we serve outside the semiconductor market, due to the nature of our highly specialized product offerings in these non-semiconductor markets, we do not expect broad market penetration in many of these markets and, therefore, do not anticipate developing meaningful market shares in these non-semiconductor markets. In addition, our orders and net revenues in any given period in these markets do not necessarily reflect the overall trends in these non-semiconductor markets due to our limited market shares. Consequently, we are continuing to evaluate buying patterns and opportunities for growth in these non-semiconductor markets that may affect our performance. The level of our orders and net revenues from these non-semiconductor markets has varied in the past, and we expect will vary significantly in the future, as we work to build our presence in these markets and establish new markets for our products. As previously mentioned, Ambrell, which we acquired in May 2017, sells its products almost exclusively to customers in the industrial market, which is one of the non-semiconductor markets we serve. We expect that the acquisition of Ambrell will significantly increase our orders and net revenues from markets outside the semiconductor market. As a result, we expect that our future orders and net revenues will be approximately equally split between the semiconductor and non-semiconductor markets.
While the majority of our orders and net revenues are derived from the ATE market, our operating results do not always follow the overall trend in the ATE market in any given period. We believe that these anomalies may be driven by a variety of factors within the ATE market, including, for example, changing product requirements, longer time periods between new product offerings by OEMs and changes in customer buying patterns. In particular, demand for the products sold by EMS, which are sold exclusively within the ATE market, and our operating margins in these product segments have been affected by shifts in the competitive landscape, including (i) customers placing heightened emphasis on shorter lead times (which places increased demands on our available engineering and production capacity increasing unit costs) and ordering in smaller quantities (which prevents us from acquiring component materials in larger volumes at lower cost and increasing unit costs), (ii) the practice of OEMs specifying other suppliers as primary vendors, with less frequent opportunities to compete for such designations, (iii) the in-house manufacturing activities of OEMs building certain products we have historically sold to them, including manipulators, docking hardware and tester interfaces, which has had the impact of significantly reducing the size of the available market for those certain products, (iv) the role of third-party test and assembly houses in the ATE market and their requirement of products with a greater range of use at the lowest cost, (v) customer supply chain management groups demanding lower prices and spreading purchases across multiple vendors, and (vi) certain competitors aggressively reducing their products' sales prices (causing us to either reduce our products' sales prices to be successful in obtaining the sale or causing loss of the sale).
In addition, in recent periods we have seen instances where demand for ATE is not consistent for each of our product segments or for any given product within a particular product segment. This inconsistency in demand for ATE can be driven by a number of factors, but in most cases, we have found that the primary reason is unique customer-specific changes in demand for certain products driven by the needs of their customers or markets served. These shifts in market practices and customer-specific needs have had, and may continue to have, varying levels of impact on our operating results and are difficult to quantify or predict from period to period. Management has taken, and will continue to take, such actions it deems appropriate to adjust our strategies, products and operations to counter such shifts in market practices as they become evident.
Acquisition
On May 24, 2017, we completed the acquisition of Ambrell by acquiring all of its outstanding capital stock. Ambrell is a manufacturer of precision induction heating systems used to conduct fast, efficient, repeatable non-contact heating of metals or other electrically conductive materials, in order to transform raw materials into finished parts. The Ambrell acquisition complements our current thermal technologies and broadens our diverse customer base, allowing expansion within many non-semiconductor related markets, such as consumer product packaging, fiber-optics, automotive and other markets. This acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination using purchase accounting. The purchase price for Ambrell was $22.6 million in cash. Additional consideration in the form of earnouts may be paid based upon a multiple of adjusted EBITDA for 2017 and 2018. The 2017 and 2018 earnouts, in the aggregate, are capped at $18 million. As of March 31, 2018, we had accrued $5.8 million in earnout payable based on Ambrell’s 2017 adjusted EBITDA, which was paid in April 2018, and $7.0 million as a contingent consideration liability based on our current projections for Ambrell’s 2018 adjusted EBITDA. For further discussion of the acquisition, see Notes 3 and 4 to our consolidated financial statements.
Orders and Backlog
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a breakdown of the orders received by operating segment and market (in thousands).
Three |
Change |
Three |
Change |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
$ |
% |
2017 |
$ |
% |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Orders: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thermal |
$ | 14,501 | $ | 7,260 | $ | 7,241 | 100 | % |
$ | 15,785 | $ | (1,284 | ) |
(8 | )% |
|||||||||||||
EMS |
6,087 | 7,772 | (1,685 | ) |
(22 | )% |
5,969 | 118 | 2 | % |
||||||||||||||||||
$ | 20,588 | $ | 15,032 | $ | 5,556 | 37 | % |
$ | 21,754 | $ | (1,166 | ) |
(5 | )% |
||||||||||||||
Semiconductor market |
$ | 12,531 | $ | 11,559 | $ | 972 | 8 | % |
$ | 10,051 | $ | 2,480 | 25 | % |
||||||||||||||
Non-semiconductor market |
8,057 | 3,473 | 4,584 | 132 | % |
11,703 | (3,646 | ) |
(31 | )% |
||||||||||||||||||
$ | 20,588 | $ | 15,032 | $ | 5,556 | 37 | % |
$ | 21,754 | $ | (1,166 | ) |
(5 | )% |
Total consolidated orders for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were $20.6 million compared to $15.0 million for the same period in 2017 and $21.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the orders of our Thermal segment included $7.0 million of orders attributable to Ambrell, which we acquired on May 24, 2017, as previously discussed. Of the orders attributable to Ambrell, $2.3 million were from customers in the semiconductor market and the balance were from non-semiconductor market customers. When adjusted to eliminate the impact of the orders attributable to Ambrell, our consolidated orders would have decreased $1.5 million, or 10%, as compared to the same period in 2017. This reduction primarily represents a decrease in demand experienced by our EMS segment which we believe reflects cyclical and seasonal softening in the semiconductor ATE market.
When adjusted to eliminate the orders attributable to Ambrell, orders from customers in non-semiconductor markets for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were $3.3 million, or 25% of total consolidated orders, compared to $3.5 million, or 23% of total consolidated orders for the same period in 2017. The level of our orders in these non- semiconductor markets has varied in the past, and we expect it will vary significantly in the future as we build our presence in these markets and establish new markets for our products.
At March 31, 2018, our backlog of unfilled orders for all products was approximately $15.4 million compared with approximately $8.2 million at March 31, 2017 and $13.7 million at December 31, 2017. At March 31, 2018, our backlog included $6.3 million attributable to Ambrell. Our backlog includes customer orders which we have accepted, substantially all of which we expect to deliver in 2018. While backlog is calculated on the basis of firm purchase orders, a customer may cancel an order or accelerate or postpone currently scheduled delivery dates. Our backlog may be affected by the tendency of customers to rely on short lead times available from suppliers, including us, in periods of depressed demand. In periods of increased demand, there is a tendency towards longer lead times that has the effect of increasing backlog. As a result, our backlog at a particular date is not necessarily indicative of sales for any future period.
Net Revenues
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a breakdown of the net revenues by operating segment and market (in thousands).
Three |
Change |
Three |
Change |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
2017 |
$ |
% |
2017 |
$ |
% |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thermal |
$ | 13,234 | $ | 7,776 | $ | 5,458 | 70 | % |
$ | 13,794 | $ | (560 | ) |
(4 | )% |
|||||||||||||
EMS |
5,637 | 6,404 | (767 | ) |
(12 | )% |
5,587 | 50 | 1 | % |
||||||||||||||||||
$ | 18,871 | $ | 14,180 | $ | 4,691 | 33 | % |
$ | 19,381 | $ | (510 | ) |
(3 | )% |
||||||||||||||
Semiconductor market |
$ | 10,539 | $ | 10,439 | $ | 100 | 1 | % |
$ | 8,007 | $ | 2,532 | 32 | % |
||||||||||||||
Non-semiconductor market |
8,332 | 3,741 | 4,591 | 123 | % |
11,374 | (3,042 | ) |
(27 | )% |
||||||||||||||||||
$ | 18,871 | $ | 14,180 | $ | 4,691 | 33 | % |
$ | 19,381 | $ | (510 | ) |
(3 | )% |
Total consolidated net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were $18.9 million compared to $14.2 million for the same period in 2017 and $19.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recorded $6.2 million in net revenues attributable to Ambrell, $962,000 of which were from customers in the semiconductor market and the balance of which were from non-semiconductor market customers. When adjusted to eliminate the impact of the net revenues attributable to Ambrell, our consolidated net revenues would have decreased $1.5 million, or 11%, as compared to the same period in 2017. This decrease reflects the aforementioned softening in the semiconductor ATE market as well as reduced levels of demand from certain of our customers in the telecommunications market.
When adjusted to eliminate the impact of the net revenues attributable to Ambrell, as a percent of our total consolidated net revenues, net revenues from customers in non-semiconductor markets were 24% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 26% for the same period in 2017.
Product/Customer Mix
Both of our operating segments each have multiple products that we design, manufacture and market to our customers. Due to a number of factors, our products have varying levels of gross margin. The mix of products we sell in any period is ultimately determined by our customers' needs. Therefore, the mix of products sold in any given period can change significantly from the prior period. As a result, our consolidated gross margin can be significantly impacted in any given period by a change in the mix of products sold in that period.
We sell most of our thermal test and semiconductor production test products to semiconductor manufacturers and third-party test and assembly houses (end user sales) and to ATE manufacturers (OEM sales), who ultimately resell our equipment with theirs to both semiconductor manufacturers and third-party test and assembly houses. Our Thermal segment also sells into a variety of other markets, including the automotive, consumer electronics, defense/aerospace, energy, industrial and telecommunications markets. As a result of the acquisition of Ambrell, we now also sell into the consumer products packaging, fiber optics and other markets within the broader industrial market. The mix of customers during any given period will affect our gross margin due to differing sales discounts and commissions. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, our OEM sales as a percentage of net revenues were 14% and 12%, respectively.
OEM sales generally have a lower gross margin than end user sales, as OEM sales historically have had a more significant discount. Our current net operating margins on most OEM sales, however, are only slightly less than margins on end user sales because of the payment of third party sales commissions on most end user sales. We have also continued to experience demands from our OEM customers' supply chain managers to reduce our sales prices to them. If we cannot further reduce our manufacturing and operating costs, these pricing pressures will negatively affect our gross and operating margins.
Results of Operations
The results of operations for our two operating segments are generally affected by the same factors described in the Overview section above. Separate discussions and analyses for each segment would be repetitive. The discussion and analysis that follows, therefore, is presented on a consolidated basis and includes discussion of factors unique to each segment where significant to an understanding of that segment.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Net Revenues. Net revenues were $18.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $14.2 million for the same period in 2017, an increase of $4.7 million, or 33%. Our net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2018 included $6.2 million of net revenues attributable to Ambrell. We believe the decrease in our net revenues when adjusted to eliminate the impact of Ambrell during the first quarter of 2018 primarily reflects the factors previously discussed in the Overview.
Gross Margin. Our consolidated gross margin was 50% of net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2018 as compared to 55% of net revenues for the same period in 2017. The decrease in our gross margin as a percentage of net revenues primarily reflects an increase in our fixed operating costs. Of the $1.3 million increase in these costs, $1.1 million represents the fixed operating costs attributable to Ambrell. The remaining $152,000 increase in our fixed operating costs primarily reflects higher salary and benefits expense for our Thermal segment.
Selling Expense. Selling expense was $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $1.7 million for the same period in 2017, an increase of $808,000, or 48%. Our expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 included $1.0 million of selling costs attributable to Ambrell. When adjusted to eliminate this amount, selling expense would have decreased $224,000, or 13%, for the first quarter of 2018 as compared to same period in 2017, primarily reflecting lower levels of commissions for both of our segments and reduced travel expenditures for our Thermal segment.
Engineering and Product Development Expense. Engineering and product development expense was $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $935,000 for the same period in 2017, an increase of $361,000, or 39%. Engineering expense attributable to Ambrell in the first quarter of 2018 was $316,000. When adjusted to eliminate this amount, engineering expense would have increased $46,000, or 5%, for the first quarter of 2018 as compared to same period in 2017. This increase primarily reflects increased spending on materials used in new product development for both of our segments.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense was $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $2.0 million for the same period in 2017, an increase of $996,000, or 50%. Our expenses for the first quarter of 2018 included $787,000 of general and administrative expense attributable to Ambrell. Ambrell’s general and administrative expense included $193,000 of amortization of intangible assets. When adjusted to eliminate the expenses attributable to Ambrell, general and administrative expense would have increased $209,000 or 11%, primarily reflecting an increase in fees paid to third party professionals who assist us in a variety of compliance related matters and higher levels of accruals for profit related bonuses. These increases were partially offset by reduced salary and benefits in corporate.
Contingent Consideration Liability Adjustment. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recorded an increase in the fair value of our liability for contingent consideration of $1.7 million. This liability is a result of our acquisition of Ambrell in May 2017 and is discussed further in Notes 3 and 4 to our consolidated financial statements. The increase in the fair value is primarily a result of an increase in the projected adjusted EBITDA of Ambrell for the year ending December 31, 2018.
Income Tax Expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recorded income tax expense of $601,000 compared to $1.1 million for the same period in 2017. Our effective tax rate was 61% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 35% for the same period in 2017. On a quarterly basis, we record income tax expense or benefit based on the expected annualized effective tax rate for the various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate our businesses. The increase in our effective tax rate reflects recording the aforementioned increase of $1.7 million in our liability for contingent consideration which is not deductible for tax purposes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As discussed more fully in the Overview, our business and results of operations are substantially dependent upon the demand for ATE by semiconductor manufacturers and companies that specialize in the testing of ICs. The cyclical and volatile nature of demand for ATE makes estimates of future revenues, results of operations and net cash flows difficult.
Our primary historical source of liquidity and capital resources has been cash flow generated by our operations, and we manage our businesses to maximize operating cash flows as our primary source of liquidity. We use cash to fund growth in our operating assets, for new product research and development, for acquisitions and for stock repurchases.
Liquidity
Our cash and cash equivalents and working capital were as follows (in thousands):
March 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 14,438 | $ | 13,290 | ||||
Working capital |
$ | 17,649 | $ | 16,580 |
As of March 31, 2018, $2.8 million of our cash and cash equivalents was held by our foreign subsidiaries. We currently expect our cash and cash equivalents and projected future cash flow to be sufficient to support our short term working capital requirements, the post-acquisition integration of Ambrell, the earnout payable and potential contingent consideration payments for Ambrell and other corporate requirements. However, we may need additional financial resources, which could include debt or equity financings, to consummate a significant acquisition if the consideration in such a transaction would require us to utilize a substantial portion of, or an amount equal to or in excess of, our available cash. We do not currently have any credit facilities under which we can borrow to help fund our working capital or other requirements.
Cash Flows
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was $2.3 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recorded net earnings of $381,000 which included the impact of a $1.2 million increase in the fair value of our contingent consideration liability and a $478,000 increase in the liability for the earnout payable, both of which are a result of our acquisition of Ambrell in May 2017 as discussed further in Notes 3 and 4 to our consolidated financial statements. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we also recorded non-cash charges of $405,000 for depreciation and amortization and $120,000 for amortization of deferred compensation expense related to stock-based awards. Inventories and accounts payable increased $1.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2018, reflecting increased business activity. Accrued wages and benefits declined $1.0 million during the first three months of 2018, primarily reflecting the payout of profit-related bonuses that had been accrued at December 31, 2017 on our results for the year.
Investing Activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, purchases of property and equipment were $1.2 million, primarily reflecting leasehold improvements for the new facility for Ambrell in Rochester, New York. We currently plan to spend approximately $2.1 million on leasehold improvements for this facility. We expect to spend the balance of these funds during the second quarter of 2018 and took occupancy of the Rochester facility on May 1, 2018. We have no other significant commitments for capital expenditures for the balance of 2018; however, depending upon changes in market demand or manufacturing and sales strategies, we may make such purchases or investments as we deem necessary and appropriate.
New or Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
See the Notes to our consolidated financial statements for information concerning the implementation and impact of new or recently adopted accounting standards.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventories, long-lived assets, goodwill, identifiable intangibles, contingent consideration liabilities and deferred income tax valuation allowances. We base our estimates on historical experience and on appropriate and customary assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Some of these accounting estimates and assumptions are particularly sensitive because of their significance to our consolidated financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ markedly from what had been assumed when the financial statements were prepared. As of March 31, 2018, there have been no significant changes to the accounting policies that we have deemed critical. These policies are more fully described in our 2017 Form 10-K.
Off -Balance Sheet Arrangements
There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the three months ended March 31, 2018 that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our interests.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
This disclosure is not required for a smaller reporting company.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Because there are inherent limitations in all control systems, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, as opposed to absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Accordingly, our management has designed the disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system were met.
CEO/CFO Conclusions about the Effectiveness of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b), management, including our CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
From time to time we may be a party to legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings.
Information regarding the primary risks and uncertainties that could materially and adversely affect our future performance or could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements, appears in Part I, Item 1A - "Risk Factors" of our 2017 Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2018.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
None.
3.1 |
Bylaws, as amended and restated effective April 23, 2018 (1) |
|
10.1 |
||
|
31.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
31.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
32.1 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
101.INS |
XBRL Taxonomy Instance Document |
|
101.SCH |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
101.CAL |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
101.DEF |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
101.LAB |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
101.PRE |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2018, File No. |
(2) |
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 12, 2018. File No. 001-36117, filed March 15, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
inTEST Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
May 14, 2018 |
/s/ James Pelrin |
|
|
James Pelrin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
May 14, 2018 |
/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr. |
|
|
Hugh T. Regan, Jr. |
- 26 -
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, James Pelrin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2018
/s/ James Pelrin
James Pelrin
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2018
/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
inTEST CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Pelrin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 14, 2018
/s/ James Pelrin
James Pelrin
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
inTEST CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 14, 2018
/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer